NCSL: Education advocates push for big ideas on road to pandemic recovery

Attendees gather at the National Conference of State Legislatures summit. (Credit: NCSL)

Aug 07, 2024
Key Points
  • Top think tank executives weigh in on crafting policies to help students recover from pandemic
  • All agree schools must create new barometers for measuring success besides academic metrics
  • Student behavior, cellphones in schools and learning loss identified as key issues for schools

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — State lawmakers should think big when crafting policies to help students recover from the pandemic, leaders of influential education policy groups said Wednesday.

Three top think tank executives — Ross Wiener, vice president at the Aspen Institute; Michael Petrilli, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an Ohio-based pro-school choice think tank; and Tom Greene, vice president of advocacy for ExcelinEd, an education reform think tank founded by Jeb Bush — joined Washington state Rep. Sharon Tomiko Santos for a panel discussion on education policy.

The panel, which brought together voices from across the ideological spectrum, was part of the National Conference of State Legislatures’ annual summit. Most prominent among education policy issues was the continued recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused learning losses for many students.

Schools were “left holding the bag” during the pandemic, Wiener said, as they supported children through meals, health care and other areas. States saw an infusion of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds, but it’s unclear how schools will fare when those funds expire in September.

“Saying, ‘Schools, that’s all on you,’ was an abdication we all have to grapple with,” Wiener said.

Petrilli said states are generally doing a “terrible job” helping students recover.

“We’re not even making up the learning loss,” he said. “We’re going in the other direction. … Just looking at the facts, we are not getting the job done.”

Tomiko Santos, a Democrat who chairs her state’s House Education Committee, said she — like Petrilli — would give policymakers an “F” for their response to the pandemic. She said there needs to be a greater sense of urgency and “we’ve got our heads buried in the sand” if people don’t think the pandemic will have lingering effects on children.

“I’m not so sure that the correct metric is whether or not we are going forward in our academic metrics right now,” Tomiko Santos said. “My question is, how are we measuring and creating the conditions where teaching and learning can thrive?”

The panelists shared which areas of education policy they believe have fallen under the radar over the past few years — and others they think are overblown.

Greene said he hasn’t seen enough effort put into creating pathways to jobs for students.

“We should be preparing our kids to meet that demand for skilled jobs,” he said, but many career and technical education programs don’t align with the demands of a modern workforce.

There’s a crisis of student misbehavior, Petrilli said, and teachers’ top concern is that students are “out of control” postpandemic. Educators don’t feel supported by districts, he said, because of a lack of a desire to discipline students who act out.

“We don’t want to get back to suspending kids willy-nilly,” Petrilli said, but he argued that policymakers need to understand that disruptions make the environment bad for peers and teachers.

Tomiko Santos said lawmakers’ concentration on learning loss is an issue because it drives an emphasis on test score metrics. Instead, she said, states need to focus on transforming education.

She said schools should concentrate on three new “Rs” — relevance and rigor of academic programming, along with helping students build relationships — rather than just reading, writing and arithmetic.

Like Greene, Tomiko Santos said schools should create new avenues for students to get hands-on experiences and learn how to apply classroom skills in the real world.

Wiener also highlighted issues facing students’ mental health and said states should make a school’s learning environment more of a barometer for measuring success than test scores.

He also said “culture war issues” — such as banning books and limiting curricula — are getting too much attention. Wiener said those issues sow mistrust and undermine confidence in schools.

Communities should have a say in what students learn, Wiener said, but it’s a policy area that’s lately been over-politicized.

A brief discussion of cellphone restrictions — a growing trend at statehouses — surfaced during the panel discussion.

Greene called for banning cellphones in schools and said countries with high-performing education systems don’t allow smartphones. He said states should “step in and be the bad guy.”

But Tomiko Santos cautioned that banning phones might be “leaping to a silver bullet response.” Teachers know whether having cellphones in their classrooms is a good or bad idea, she said.

Brett Stover is a Statehouse reporter at State Affairs Pro Kansas/Hawver’s Capitol Report. Reach him at [email protected] or on X @BrettStoverKS.

Know the most important news affecting Georgia

Get our free weekly newsletter that covers government, policy and politics that impact your everyday life—in 5 minutes or less.

Related Topics: