AG: Candidates can expense babysitting costs on the trail

Mayes issued an opinion Monday establishing childcare expenses as a permissible campaign expense. “Arizona’s campaign finance law permits the use of privately raised campaign funds for dependent care if, and only if, the expenses are for the purpose of enabling the candidate or other person to perform campaign activities,” Mayes wrote in her opinion. A news release from Vote Mama Foundation, a group that tracks the use of campaign funds for child care, noted Arizona is the 35th state in the nation to this practice. Mayes noted Arizona law doesn’t allow office holders to use public funds for child care. The request for the attorney general’s opinion came from four legislators all with young children, E. Diaz, Liguori, Crews and Travers. Travers, a mother of a 10-year-old and a six-year-old, said the Democrats who requested the opinion and some legislative Republicans who expressed support for campaign childcare expenses want to see political office be more accessible for parents in the state. “It’s not always appropriate to bring a child with you to an event,” Travers said. “Not everybody has the resources to pay for child care, and I don’t think it should be incumbent on us to rely on our family members.” In 2018, the Federal Election Commission ruled that federal candidates can use campaign funds to pay for childccare costs associated with time spent campaigning. According to Vote Mama, less than 7% of Arizona state legislators are mothers with minor children. “Political leaders should look like Arizona, and I’m pleased to see child care won’t be a reason a mom, dad or caregiver can’t share their gifts and passions fighting for a thriving Arizona,” Crews said in the Vote Mama news release.

ADOT wants funding to keep Amtrak project on track after Hoffman’s attempts to derail

The Department of Transportation is requesting $200,000 in funding for fiscal year 2026 to continue operations on a proposed Amtrak expansion project between Phoenix and Tucson after Hoffman attempted in February to prohibit the agency from pursuing commuter rail projects. In its budget request sent to the governor’s office, ADOT says the $200,000 will go towards administrative costs related to a federal grant for the Corridor Identification and Development program. ADOT says it will continue asking for the one-time funding until the program is complete. If the funding is not provided, the project would likely end, and the state would lose out of the federal funding, according to ADOT. The Phoenix-Tucson Rail Corridor project is still in early planning stages, but Hoffman attempted to derail the process when ADOT came up for continuation during this year’s legislative session. He tacked on contingencies to the bill that extended the agency’s life, attempting to prevent ADOT from accepting any funding for a commuter rail project. The provisions were later removed and ADOT was continued without fanfare. Amtrak and Phoenix officials recently announced that the Phoenix-Tucson Rail Corridor project is moving along, and both Amtrak and ADOT are expected to move into the next phase of planning in the coming months.

Federal court sends former Trump chief of staff back to state court

Former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows’ criminal prosecution for his alleged involvement in the alternate electors scheme is staying in Maricopa County Superior Court after a district judge denied his bid to see his case moved to federal court. Meadows argued for removal of his criminal case to federal court as he claimed the nine charges levied against him occurred during his time as chief of staff. Under Supreme Court case law, federal officials can see their cases removed to federal court and then establish an immunity defense under the Supremacy Clause. “The Maricopa County indictment squarely relates to Mr. Meadows’s conduct as Chief of Staff to the President. Nothing Mr. Meadows is alleged in the indictment to have done is criminal per se. Rather, it consists of allegations that he received (and occasionally responded to) messages from people who were trying to get ideas in front of President Trump or seeking to inform Mr. Meadows about the strategy and status of various legal efforts by the President’s campaign,” Meadows’ attorney, Anne Chapman, wrote in the notice of removal. “Serving as the filter for the President’s time and attention is well within the Chief of Staff’s role. Indeed, it would be unusual if people did not reach out to the Chief of Staff on these matters or that a Chief of Staff would not be aware of these significant matters demanding the attention of the President.” The state rebutted Meadows’ attempt to move the case and claimed he missed the 30-day deadline to move for removal and failed to show a true link between his federal duties and the criminal behavior alleged in the indictment. Judge John Tuchi, an Obama nominee, agreed with the state, and wrote, “Mr. Meadows frames the Chief of Staff’s role as essentially the gatekeeper who controls access to the President … Contrary to Mr. Meadows’s assertions, the State has not indicted Mr. Meadows for merely facilitating communication to and from the President or for simply staying abreast of campaign goings-on. Instead, the State has indicted Mr. Meadows for allegedly orchestrating and participating in an illegal electioneering scheme. Few, if any, of the State’s factual allegations even resemble the secretarial duties that Mr. Meadows maintains are the subject of the indictment.” Tuchi remanded Meadows’ case back to the superior court.

Phoenix City Council race feels tremors from endorsements

The race for the Phoenix City Council District 7 seat, which features one current state senator and a former representative, was shaken up by recent endorsements. An Hernandez and former state representative Marcelino Quinonez​, both Democrats, are running against Martyn Bridgeman​ and Michael Nowakowski​ for the seat. Quinonez announced that his campaign had garnered the endorsement of U.S. Rep. Ruben Gallego on Monday afternoon, just a week after Phoenix Mayor Kate Gallego had done the same. He also has the backing of Schwiebert, Alston, and a few local groups, like the Phoenix Association of Realtors, An Hernandez brushed off the endorsements, though, and told our reporter she is “too busy knocking on doors and talking directly to the voters to think too much about his endorsements.” “They (the endorsements) show that it confirms he was recruited to run against the most progressive candidate,” An Hernandez said. “My focus will remain on earning the most important endorsement, and this is of the community and voters of D7.” The race unfolded controversy between the two Legislative candidates after An Hernandez criticized Quinonez on social media amid rumors of him running for the same seat. “It be your own people SMH. Guess some men will do anything to help undermine the work of a progressive woman of color,” An Hernandez wrote in a post on X at the time. He eventually announced his candidacy on social media in May, months after An Hernandez had kick-started her campaign. An Hernandez and Quinonez have a clear advantage as former state lawmakers when it comes to campaign fundraising. An Hernandez finished slightly ahead of Quinonez in the second quarter with $69,034 on hand, while he had $53,124.

Braun calls for universal school vouchers in education platform

Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Braun is backing the removal of all income limits for the state’s private school voucher program as part of his education platform.

Braun’s proposals released Tuesday call for targeting pay raises for teachers in “high-need content areas” without specifying any salary goals such as the $60,000 minimum pay level that Democratic candidate Jennifer McCormick wants implemented.

Braun also proposed creating a new Office of School Safety and reiterated support for laws adopted in recent years requiring schools to notify parents if their child wants to use a different name or pronouns and banning transgender students from competing in girls school sports.

Here are some key parts of Braun’s proposals:

Universal private school vouchers

The Braun plan would lift the income limits on the state’s school voucher program that have been greatly eased by Republican legislators in recent years.

Lawmakers in 2023 approved a voucher expansion that raised the income limit for a family of four from $154,000 to $220,000. That step and broader eligibility provisions led to a 32% jump to nearly 71,000 students receiving voucher money this past school year and the program’s cost growing to $439 million — up from $311 million a year earlier, according to a state Department of Education report.

“Reform the Choice Scholarship Program to allow every Hoosier family, regardless of income, race, ZIP code, or other factors, to choose the school that best fits their children’s educational needs,” said a policy paper from the Braun-aligned group Hoosiers for Opportunity, Prosperity and Enterprise that his campaign distributed.

Democrats have opposed the voucher expansions, arguing that the program drains money away from traditional public schools. Braun’s plan, however, embraces opening the program to any student regardless of family income as backed by Republican House Speaker Todd Huston.

Uncertainty about the future costs of the voucher program has drawn the attention of the national credit rating agencies that review the state government’s fiscal condition.

“The school choice program functions as an open-ended entitlement with the potential for higher costs if enrollment materially exceeds the state’s expectations,” a 2023 report from Fitch Ratings said.

McCormick’s campaign called Braun’s proposals “ill-informed.”

“After 20 years of one-party rule, I’m surprised Mike Braun has offered an education plan that is as bad as it is for Hoosier children,” McCormick campaign manager Kelly Wittman said in an email to State Affairs.

McCormick, a former Republican state school superintendent, has called for schools accepting vouchers to be held to the same academic and financial standards as traditional public schools. 

Boosting teacher pay, number of new teachers

Braun’s platform called for improving teacher pay without giving a salary target and expanding programs to transition professionals with college degrees into teaching jobs to help address educator shortages.

Braun’s plan indicated that not all teachers would see the same attention to their salaries.

“Increase Indiana’s public teacher base salary, ensure teachers in high-need content areas have higher pay, and institute statewide student outcomes-focused performance pay to reward high-performing teachers,” the policy paper released by his campaign said.

McCormick, meanwhile, wants the state to set a $60,000 minimum teacher salary. The statewide average during the 2022-23 school year was about $58,500, according to a state report.

“It’s time that we make sure that we’re treating teachers the way we need them to be treated — like the professionals they are,” McCormick said. 

The pro-Braun group’s policy paper said the state should “identify content areas and school districts with teacher shortages, and direct the State’s resources toward recruiting these high-need teachers.”

School safety and transgender issues

Braun said he wanted to establish an Indiana Office of School Safety and increase funding for security grants to school districts.

The new safety office would “streamline and enhance existing authorities at the Department of Education, Department of Homeland Security, and Indiana State Police,” the policy paper said.

“Indiana’s school safety authorities are fragmented across different agencies,” the paper said. “As modern threats continue to grow in complexity, the State must ensure that local communities and schools are supported so that no aspect of school safety falls through the cracks.”

Braun’s platform included support for Republican-backed laws adopted over the past two years requiring parental notifications about students wanting to use a different name or pronouns and banning transgender students from competing in girls school sports.

“The State should continue to ensure that biological males will not compete against our girls on the court, in the pool, or invade the privacy of their locker rooms,” the policy paper said.

What Braun and teachers union say about platform

Braun’s statement releasing his platform said “parents are the primary stakeholders in their kids’ education.”

“My future-focused education plan puts Hoosier kids and parents first, raises teacher pay and incentive, ensures that our kids are safe, and puts Indiana schools on the path to become the best in the nation,” Braun said.

The Indiana State Teachers Association, the state’s largest teachers union, has endorsed McCormick and said that under her plans “educators will have a voice in their working conditions and students’ learning conditions, adequate school funding, safe, inclusive learning environments, and strong student mental health support.”

“Hoosier educators deserve competitive compensation, respect and the ability to have a voice in their profession,” union President Keith Gambill said in a statement.

Tom Davies is a Statehouse reporter for State Affairs Pro Indiana. Reach him at [email protected] or on X at @TomDaviesIND.

Suspicious packages prompt Memorial Hall evacuation, FBI probe

A government building near the Kansas Statehouse was evacuated Monday after suspicious packages exposed personnel to unknown substances. 

City of Topeka spokesperson Rosie Nichols said in a statement that a field test did not turn up any hazardous materials but that personnel exposed to the substances were medically evaluated. 

Election offices in at least six states on Monday also received powder-laced parcels. Those states, according to the AP, included Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Wyoming. And like Kansas, the other states also did not turn up any hazardous materials. 

Topeka Fire Department crews, including its hazardous materials team, were dispatched to Memorial Hall, 120 SW 10th St., around 2:15 p.m. in response to a package received by the Kansas Secretary of State’s Office. The building houses the Secretary of State’s and Attorney General’s offices. 

April McCollum, a spokesperson for the Kansas Highway Patrol, said in a statement that the evacuation was a precautionary measure that “allowed for a hazardous devices officer to enter and collect the package, which required a response from the Topeka Fire Department.” 

Capitol Police were notified around 2:40 p.m. about a second, larger package received by the Attorney General’s Office. Discovery of the second package, according to McCollum, prompted the State Fire Marshal to contact the FBI for assistance in “collecting” it. Nichols told State Affairs she was not able to confirm whether the packages were directly addressed to those specific offices.

“It is unknown at this time if the same person sent both packages,” McCollum said. 

Whitney Tempel, a spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s Office, confirmed the incident but referred the matter to the Kansas Highway Patrol for additional details. McCollum, meanwhile, called it an “active investigation” by the FBI. 

“Any further inquiries regarding the second package will need to be forwarded to the FBI,” McCollum said.

Monday’s incident marks the third time since June 2023 that Memorial Hall has been the target of similar incidents.

Matt Resnick is a statehouse reporter at State Affairs Pro Kansas/Hawver’s Capitol Report. Reach him at mresnick@stateaffairs.com.

Poll: Republicans lead statewide races but trail Trump

Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Braun and other statewide GOP candidates have solid leads among likely voters but are significantly trailing Donald Trump in support, according to an independent poll released Tuesday.

Democrats argued that their candidates have opportunities to gain support against statewide Republican candidates who are underperforming this election cycle.

Statewide race poll numbers

The Emerson College Polling/The Hill survey found Braun leading Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jennifer McCormick 45% to 34%, with 6% support for Libertarian Donald Rainwater and 13% undecided.

In the U.S. Senate race, Republican Jim Banks had 47% support over 33% for Democrat Valerie McCray, with 5% for Libertarian Andrew Horning and 14% undecided.

In the race for state attorney general, Republican incumbent Todd Rokita leads Democratic challenger Destiny Wells 49% to 35%, with 16% undecided. 

Trump, however, had a larger lead in the presidential race — the poll found him with 57% support among Indiana voters. Vice President Kamala Harris had 40% support and 2% were undecided. 

Trump’s margin is essentially the same as in the 2020 election, when he won Indiana 57% to 41% over President Joe Biden.

The poll of 1,000 likely voters was conducted Sept. 12 and 13 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Emerson College said the survey was funded by Nexstar Media, which owns seven Indiana television stations, including WXIN and WTTV of Indianapolis.

Democrats argue Republicans underperforming

McCormick’s campaign faulted the poll’s use of opt-in online surveys as often undercounting younger and Hispanic voters and said the results differ from the campaign’s internal polling.

“Mike Braun is running scared, and for good reason,” McCormick campaign manager Kelly Wittman said in a statement. “He is a sitting U.S. senator at 45% and running 12 points behind the top of the ticket. Braun’s ceiling appears to be very low for a statewide elected Republican in Indiana due to his unpopularity.”

The Braun campaign didn’t immediately reply to requests for comment Tuesday.

A spokeswoman for Wells, who is challenging Rokita, argued statewide Republicans should be over 50% among Indiana voters at this point in the election cycle.

“Democrats are over-performing, and independent voters have yet to decide,” Wells spokeswoman Hannah Smith said. “There is nothing but opportunity in these numbers, and our internal polling shows the real secret: the numbers break toward Destiny Wells, not toward career politician Todd Rokita.” 

Rokita campaign adviser Brent Littlefield said the campaign wasn’t taking Rokita’s reelection for granted.

“We know our campaign must continue communicating his strong record of accomplishments related to crime, the economy, illegal immigration and other issues,” Littlefield said.

Top issues and Biden, Holcomb ratings

The poll found the economy as the top issue for 44% of Indiana voters, followed by education (9%), housing affordability (8%), abortion access (8%), threats to democracy (8%), immigration (8%) and health care (6%). 

“Voters under 30 are most likely to rate the economy as the top issue facing their state, at 49%, while voters over 70 are least likely, at 35%. Instead, voters over 70 are most concerned about threats to democracy (12%) and immigration (10%),” said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling.

The voters surveyed in the poll gave Biden a 28% approval rating as president, with a 64% disapproval mark. 

Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb had 35% job approval, while 31% disapproved of his performance in office.

Tom Davies is a Statehouse reporter for State Affairs Pro Indiana. Reach him at [email protected] or on X at @TomDaviesIND.

Opinion: Maybe the vitriol in Congress isn’t as bad as it seems

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — If you’ve followed media coverage of Congress over the past few years, it’s been hard to escape two impressions: Not much gets done there, and members spend a lot of their time tearing into one another. 

We can argue about the first — certainly, recent Congresses have been less productive than their predecessors — but now hard evidence shows the second impression is just plain wrong. The vast majority of members, it turns out, focus on substance and policy, not on personal attacks.
 


That conclusion comes from an interesting and useful new online tool created by a group of academics at Dartmouth College, the University of Pennsylvania and Stanford University. Their group, the Polarization Research Lab, recently launched America’s Political Pulse. Basically, the site tracks, analyzes and catalogs all public statements made by members of Congress, including Twitter/X posts, newsletters, news releases and floor speeches. It then uses AI models the group developed to classify those statements into five categories: personal attacks, policy discussion, constructive debate, accomplishments and bipartisanship/compromise.

With over 1.6 million statements since September 2022 in the database, the findings are intriguing. Most notably, during the current Congress, 66 members, or 12%, have not insulted anyone once — at least within the publicly available statements found by the Lab — while 350 of Congress’ 535 members, or 65%, have done so in less than 1% of their communications. 

That leaves 119 members who’ve engaged in personal attacks over 1% of the time.
 


That’s more than it should be, but it’s not the wholesale flamethrowing that much media coverage suggests. The director of the Polarization Research Lab, Dartmouth government Professor Sean Westwood, summed up the findings this way: “What we’ve identified is that there are a lot of members of Congress who are showing up and doing their jobs and engaging in meaningful debate and they’re not getting the attention they deserve. What is instead happening is that firebrands are absorbing all of the media attention. Our data show that Congress is not nearly as dysfunctional or polarized as people may think.”
 


What may be most useful about the online tool is that it names names, so you can see for yourself. It lists the top Senate and House members who engage in policy discussion, constructive debate and so on: Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin, for instance, leads both chambers on policy discussion; Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty of Tennessee leads similarly on constructive debate; and Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia is tops for bipartisanship.
 


The tool also lists the legislators within each party most prone to engaging in personal attacks, led by Republicans Lance Gooden of Texas and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and by Democrats Bill Pascrell of New Jersey, who died in August, and Eric Swalwell of California. You can search for any member and get a breakdown of what percentage of their communications fall into each category and where they stand compared to their peers. You can also dig into examples of comments parsed by the model and see if you agree with how they were characterized — and flag them for researchers if you disagree.
 


It’s reassuring to know that attack-dog rhetoric isn’t as widespread as it might seem, but it’s still problematic. Every moment taken up by conflict — especially on the congressional floor or in committee — is time not spent on the very real challenges our country faces or on advancing legislation aimed at addressing them. And every clickbait news story that focuses on attacks is a journalist bypassing an opportunity to improve Americans’ understanding of issues that affect their lives.
 


What the tool does is make it possible for you, as a voter, to exert some small measure of influence on this picture. 

“The current media landscape paired with a small number of firebrands in Congress creates a harmful cocktail of nonstop news of incivility and dysfunction,” University of Pennsylvania communications Professor Yphtach Lelkes said. “Holding the individuals engaging in conflict accountable and elevating effective lawmakers is critical to slowing the tide of toxic polarization in America.” 

Nobody is better equipped to do that than an informed voter.

Lee Hamilton is a senior adviser for the Indiana University Center on Representative Government, a distinguished scholar at the IU Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies and a professor of practice at the IU O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. He was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years.

General Services Commissioner Christi Branscom stepping down

General Services Department Commissioner Christi Branscom is stepping down after six years in the office that provides operational support services to all other departments and agencies in Tennessee state government.

Gov. Bill Lee has appointed Matt Van Epps, a consultant and member of the Tennessee Higher Education Commission, as her replacement.

“Christi has faithfully served state agencies and her fellow Tennesseans since day one of the Lee administration,” Lee said in a release. “During her tenure, she has led significant capital improvement projects, wisely stewarded taxpayer dollars by reducing the State’s real estate footprint, and secured the Department of General Services’ standing as a Top Tennessee Workplace for five consecutive years. Maria and I wish Christi continued success and pray God’s richest blessings over her in the days ahead.”

Her last day is Sept. 30.

Under her leadership, the General Services department and its divisions — Central Procurement Office, Document Solutions, Real Estate Asset Management (STREAM), and Vehicle & Asset Management — have received multiple national awards.

“I think she did an excellent job,” said Senate Speaker Randy McNally, R-Oak Ridge, noting Branscom “always kept us updated on things that were going on,” as State Building Commission members. That was especially important during the COVID-19 pandemic, which made it “much more difficult to predict cost increases because of inflation,” the speaker said.

Branscom joined Lee’s Cabinet when he took office in January 2019. She had been chief operating officer and general counsel at Partners Development in Knoxville. She is the founder of Grace Construction and previously served for more than five years as Knoxville Mayor Madeline Rogero’s deputy and Chief Operating Officer.

An early test for Branscom was the construction of a new inn at Fall Creek Falls State Park, a controversial project the Lee administration inherited from predecessor Bill Haslam’s time in office. In the summer of 2019, cost projections for the 95,000-square-foot facility near Spencer had skyrocketed by $11 million, or 37% over projections. 

Branscom and state Environment and Conservation Commissioner David Salyers blamed the costs on difficulties in securing a builder for the remote Upper Cumberland Plateau park site amid a construction boom in Nashville and other areas. Branscom also said the state’s current estimating process relied heavily on the architect’s projections, which had proven to have a shaky foundation. Another issue was that Tennessee assumed an annual 4% inflation on projects, which was about half the actual going rate.

Going forward, she said the state would boost inflation rates to match reality. And instead of having the project architect provide estimates, the General Services Department would use professional “construction estimators” who regularly work in the market. Another remedy was to lengthening the state’s pre-planning process on projects to try to head off surprises to the bottom line.

Branscom’s department also began estimating costs based on the midpoint of construction. The shorter timetable allowed officials to more accurately predict how inflation, equipment, materials and labor costs will factor into the bottom line, Branscom told lawmakers last year. A large project with a $200 million budget could take up to five years to complete, she said, during which time economic conditions could change dramatically.

Senate Finance Chair Bo Watson, R-Hixson, earlier this year took aim at the Tennessee Higher Education Commission for “grossly” underestimating the costs of projects on the campuses of Austin Peay State University and Middle TEnnessee State University. Watson charged that the project was proposed “with an under-appreciation” for the true costs with the knowledge that the General Assembly would have to fund the increases to get them done. THEC’s new executive director, Steven Gentile, said he was working with the state architect and the General Services Department to improve budget forecasts. 

Brancom oversaw the construction of a wastewater pipeline connecting the West Tennessee megasite with the Mississippi River, a project considered key to landing a massive investment from Ford Motor Co. The state considered a public-private partnerships or cooperating with nearby communities like Bartlett and Covington before ultimately deciding to go it alone. 

When Lee finally won his showdown with fellow REpublicans in the Legislature over removing a bust of Nathan Beford Forrest from the state Capitol, Branscom’s agency was tasked with transferring the likeness of the Confederate cavalry general and early Ku Klux Klan leader to the Tennessee State Museum. 

Citing unspecified “safety concerns,” General Services tried to block media access to the second floor of the Capitol while preparing the bust for transport. Reporters quickly suspected the administration was trying to prevent them from witnessing the moment the Forrest bust was hoisted out of its alcove. The House and Senate speakers, who have authority over the floor where the House and Senate chambers are located — and who opposed the move —  intervened to prevent the media blackout.

One of the Lee administration’s signature capital projects is the construction of a $415 million Multi-Agency Law Enforcement Training Academy in Nashville. The 800-acre campus

will house the headquarters of the Correction and Safety departments, training facilities, classrooms, dormitories, and firing ranges. Branscom had to maneuver a backlash among local residents and lawmakers who worried about the plan to include the Tennessee Correction Academy in Tullahoma in the consolidated facility. The Coffee County facility employing more than 50 people was allowed to remain as a standalone entity when the State Building Commission approved to overall project in late 2022.

Another high-profile project involves the overhaul of the old Legislative Plaza and War Memorial Building. Lawmakers moved their operations to the Cordell Hull Building in 2018 following a $128 million overhaul. One of the selling points was that maintenance costs at the subterranean Legislative Plaza were becoming prohibitive, largely due to persistent water seepage problems and an antiquated HVAC system. The initial plan was for the offices and committee rooms to be demolished and turned into another level of underground parking. But the Lee administration changed course and Branscom in early 2022 presented a first detailed look at a proposal to spend $183 million to upgrade the old facility.

The plan involves an expanded military museum, a visitors’ center, a theater, and more conference rooms. The plaza above is to be made more park-like, while overdue repairs will be undertaken on the underground parking levels and the Motlow Tunnel connecting the facility to the Capitol and the Cordell Hull Building. Lawmakers had earlier approved $106 million in upgrades to the War Memorial Building, which are scheduled to be completed in 2025 — the 100th anniversary of its opening.

Branscom has also taken steps to sell off the Citizens Plaza and James K. Polk state office buildings. The latter was home to several state agencies and the Tennessee Performing Arts Center, which is getting a new facility in the new East Bank development alongside a covered NFL stadium.

Branscom was awarded the National Association of State Chief Administrators’ national leadership award in 2023. She had become the organization’s first female president in 2021.

The state earlier this year made the surprise announcement it would seek to buy and raze the last private building on Capitol Hill for $32 million. Capitol Towers, which was twice the size of any other residential building in Nashville when it opened in 1960, would be torn down to expand the green space around the Statehouse and the Cordell Hull legislative office building.

The state plan involves using $22 million in unused state bonds to purchase the building and $10 million in reserves from General Services’ revolving fund to buy out the remaining condominium owners.

Lawmakers in 2011 approved a bill authorizing the state to sell up to $273 million in bonds to help pay for various buildings around the state. A $34 million project for the Board of Regents never came to fruition, so the state is making use of those leftover bonds to fund the Capitol Towers purchase. No new appropriation was needed because the bonds are already authorized, and the debt service is accounted for in the state budget. 

Our History: The Acadian Expulsion


The first wave of the expulsion that eventually brought the Acadians to Louisiana began in August of 1755. 

The Acadians at that point had lived in Nova Scotia (in present-day Canada) since the founding of Port-Royal, one of the first French settlements in North America, in 1605. Among the “first families” of Acadia were Doucet, Bourgeois, Boudrot (Boudreaux), Terriault (Thériot), Richard, LeBlanc, Thibodeaux, Comeau(x), Cormier, Hébert, Brault (Breaux), Granger, and Girouard. 

They were largely ignored by France and initially by England after control of their land shifted to the latter after 1713. But as tensions rose between the two powers,  the British authorities pressed the Acadians to swear, if not allegiance, at least neutrality in any conflict. 

After Fort Beauséjour fell to the British in June 1755, British Governor Charles Lawrence noted some 270 Acadian militia among the fort’s inhabitants. Lawrence pressed the Acadians to take an unqualified oath of allegiance to Britain. When they refused, he imprisoned them and gave the order for deportation.

“It was a New Englander, Charles Morris, who devised the plan to surround the Acadian churches on a Sunday morning, capture as many men as possible, breach the dykes and burn the houses and crops,” according to this account. “When the men refused to go, the soldiers threatened their families with bayonets. They went reluctantly, praying, singing and crying.”

About half the Acadian population died during the expulsion, according to some estimates. After years of wandering, about 2,600 to 3,000 Acadians sailed to Louisiana between 1764 and 1785. 

Bernardo de Galvez, the Spanish Governor of Louisiana, wanted the Acadians as a counter-influence to the nearby British. Many were attracted to the area by the familiarity of the language and remained to develop the culture now known as “Cajun.” 

However, their dialect was different from that of French who were already there, and the destitute Acadians found themselves on the bottom rung of white society. The widespread poverty that followed the Civil War eroded some of those distinctions. 

The Cajuns remained largely un-Americanized, according to historian Shane Bernard, until U.S. involvement in World War II. 

“The war experience coupled with educational and housing programs offered to returning veterans opened up a vast new world of opportunities…to leave the farm, go to college, get a good job, earn a decent wage, build a nice house,” Bernard says. “This caused a gradual migration away from small, exclusively French-speaking communities into a more modern, mainstream world.”

Editor’s note: Information for this piece came from The Canadian Encyclopedia and LSU Health’s Department of Genetics. 

This piece first ran in the Aug. 22, 2024 edition of LaPolitics Weekly. Wish you could have read it then? Subscribe today!

Your search query contained invalid characters or was empty. Please try again with a valid query.