Stay ahead of the curve as a political insider with deep policy analysis, daily briefings and policy-shaping tools.
Request a DemoGovernor weighs investigating Horne over loss of $29 million
NCSL: Swatting, catalytic converters and redistricting anchor ‘Lightning Round’ session
Georgia Sen. John Albers, R-Roswell, shared how his family was the victim of “swatting,” when someone makes a phony 911 call that results in a response from a SWAT team.
In Albers’ case, an individual called local police for a domestic dispute at the senator’s home when he and his wife were out of the state. Fifteen police officers responded to his home when only his son was there.
“When you have 25 vehicles out on a Code 3, a lot of bad things can happen,” Albers told attendees at the National Conference of State Legislatures summit in Louisville, Kentucky.
Maryland Sen. Cheryl Kagan, D-Montgomery, said each swatting call can cost $15,000 to $25,000.
Albers said several other high-ranking officials in Georgia were also targeted, and earlier this session, the Georgia General Assembly passed a bill to increase penalties.
Maryland passed its version last year, Kagan said, which was controversial because of “challenges with juvenile justice.”
“I call myself a pragmatic progressive, and people on my left were worrying about increasing penalties,” she said. “It’s a challenge, but it’s a crime. We’ve got to make sure people know about it and hopefully that’s part of the disincentive.”
All 50 states have penalties for swatting, but no federal legislation has been enacted. Thirty-three states have some level of felony penalty, usually when causing injury or death. Twenty-one states provide the ability to seek restitution for costs incurred.
Catalytic converters
Virginia tackled rampant catalytic converter thefts not by going after the perpetrators but by eliminating the market, Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle, R-Hanover, said.
The exhaust emission control devices in motor vehicles were quick and easy to steal and were being sold for $1,500 to $3,500, he told NCSL attendees.
While the parts themselves hold little value, the metals are in high demand, he said.
Addressing the crime as a larceny had evidentiary challenges, so Virginia lawmakers instead focused on the resale market.
“If you weren’t acting for a motor dealer, or scrap metal, if you didn’t have a registration or it wasn’t new, then it’s assumed you were possessing it illegally,” he said of catalytic converters. “After that went into place, it [theft] went from being a scourge to dropping dramatically.”
“It’s an effective tool,” he continued. “It’s not eliminated, but it’s reduced substantially and we’re no longer getting calls in our office like we did before.”
One negative side effect, he said, was that surrounding states saw an increase in catalytic converter thefts because there was no longer a market in Virginia.
The Ohio House in June passed a proposal, HB 328, aimed at curbing catalytic converter thefts. The current version, which awaits Senate action, requires additional record keeping and reporting and imposes a $10,000 to $50,000 penalty on business entities that violate those requirements, among other provisions.
Redistricting
Attorneys involved in Ohio’s and New York’s redistricting litigation explained the challenges faced in their respective states and how other states have handled redrawing their maps.
Frank Strigari, former chief legal counsel for the Ohio Senate, noted that Michigan has faced significant issues since a newly established independent commission was put in place.
“Basically, the people that were on that commission didn’t have any experience,” he said. “Their system was meant to be that way, but because they didn’t have experience, they had to rely on experts, consultants and all types of people, which, you can imagine, come with all sorts of partisan agendas.”
Ohio voters will decide whether to establish a similar body in November following a heavily litigated process.
“In Ohio and New York, we didn’t have the greatest success, even with well-intended reforms,” Strigari said. “I don’t know if there’s really, truly a panacea for this type of issue, especially when politics are involved. You can try to take the politics out of it, but it’s impossible to do that.”
He said it is his personal opinion that redistricting should remain in the hands of state legislatures and advised against placing the process within state constitutions.
“You’ll just constantly change the state constitution to try to make the process perfect, but it will never be perfect,” he said. “It’s not a good idea.”
Strigari and Jeff Wice, special counsel to the New York Legislature, advised lawmakers to begin planning now for the 2030 Census by making updated data easily accessible for constituents and thinking about the future system for public input and maps.
Krista Kano is a staff writer for Gongwer Ohio/State Affairs. Reach her at [email protected] or on X @krista_kano.
Judge strikes down part of voting manual over free speech rights
Primary election in July? Recipe for low turnout
Another victory for our citizen-led campaign, another step forward for Arizona
Final ballots counted in 2024 primary election
OUR VOICE, OUR VOTE ARIZONA PAC CELEBRATES ARIZONA PRIMARY WINNERS, EYES NOVEMBER ELECTIONS
OUR VOICE, OUR VOTE ARIZONA PAC ENDORSED CANDIDATES WHO WON JULY 30TH PRIMARY RACES United States Senate
- Rep. Ruben Gallego
- Rep. Oscar Del Los Santos
- Rep. Junelle Cavero
- Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton
- Analise Ortiz
- Senator Priya Sundareshan
- OD Harris – Chandler City Council
Our Voice, Our Vote Arizona continues to push civic engagement efforts forward, emphasizing the importance of community involvement and active participation, particularly from Black and Brown voters, in shaping the political landscape of Arizona. The ‘Power of Us’ campaign will continue with its statewide community town halls, strategic influencer partnerships, and voter mobilization events to ensure strong turnout in November.
Democracy should not be bought. Living United for Change in Arizona vows to await a recount to ensure every voter can have their voice heard in historic CD3 race for Raquel Terán
This continues to be a historic, grassroots campaign supporting Raquel Terán. Young, first-time voters, parents and people of color fueled this campaign, who turned out under extreme weather conditions because they knew what was at stake in this election. These are the same voters who have witnessed Raquel building community power for the last decade – standing up for immigrants, students and the community across CD 3.
The district was inundated with outside money and influence from MAGA extremists and billionaires. These billionaires poured millions into the race for their dark money special interests, attempting to drown out the voices of the very community Terán’s opponent is seeking to represent, and elect a MAGA-funded outsider who is disconnected from the values and needs of the district. Despite that spending, Raquel supporters showed up and the vote-count is now separated by just a few voices, which means this historic campaign for the first Arizona Latina Congresswoman has triggered an automatic recount.
Alejandra Gomez, Executive Director, LUCHA said in a statement: “For the past 16 years, I have witnessed Raquel’s influence and her mentorship. More than trying to become the first Arizona Latina Congresswoman, she’s a friend. She’s a mentor and a mother. She’s our neighbor and a community leader. Everywhere she has gone, she continues to build up her community. Because of that, Terán’s campaign was endorsed early on by our LUCHA members and is rooted in genuine service and advocacy for working families. She has a proven track record of standing up to right-wing extremists and fighting for justice. With yesterday’s news, the campaign goes into a recount, and the work will continue. We remain steadfast in our commitment to building grassroots power and will continue to fight against MAGA extremists and outside influence in our state.”
Final Unofficial Results from the 2024 Primary Election Posted
- Ballots cast by mailing in or dropping off a ballot or voting early in-person at a Vote Center: 664,672
- Election Day In-person Voting: 74,892 (includes provisional ballots that were tabulated)
- Maricopa County Elections offered 222 Vote Centers to serve voters throughout the county
- More than 2,500 bipartisan members of the community were hired and trained to administer the Primary Election
- 1,125 individuals voted under the Uniformed or Overseas Citizens and Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA)
- 188 Large-Print Ballots were cast
- 17 individuals voted by Braille Ballot