Stay ahead of the curve as a political insider with deep policy analysis, daily briefings and policy-shaping tools.
Request a Demo
What will happen with the Certificate of Need law? Ask 10 people, get 8 different answers
Editor’s note: This is the third in a series of stories looking at the lack of health care in areas of rural Georgia and how providers and lawmakers are dealing with the issue.
The question at the heart of one of Georgia’s most contentious public policy debates is this: Overhaul or ditch Georgia’s regulatory system that determines if new hospitals or other medical facilities are needed?
The state’s Certificate of Need law (CON) was created 44 years ago as a way to control health care costs and cut down on duplication of services and unnecessary expansions. It determines when, where and if hospitals need to be built.
In recent years, however, the regulatory law has proved controversial. Georgia lawmakers are now trying to decide whether to keep it, tweak it or do away with it entirely.
What’s Happening
Georgia’s CON law requires anyone wanting to build a new hospital or provide new medical services to prove to the state Department of Community Health that the facility or services are needed in that community.
CON has been particularly tough for those living in rural Georgia where millions of people live in medical deserts. A sudden, severe illness or even routine checkups can mean traveling hours and miles to a hospital, depending on where you live.
“Certificate of Need has been harmful for Georgia. There are fewer medical services than there would be otherwise,” Thomas Stratmann, an economics professor at George Mason University, told State Affairs. “In particular, there are fewer hospital beds, both in rural areas and urban areas, and also few ambulatory surgery centers in rural and urban areas.”
Stratmann has studied for over a decade the impact of CON on numerous states, including Georgia. He was one of several public policy and health care experts who spoke earlier this month at the Capitol for the first hearing of the Georgia Senate Study Committee on Certificate of Need Reform. Other hearings will be held throughout the summer throughout the state.
While experts spoke overwhelmingly at the hearing for ending CON laws in Georgia, there are those who say it works.
“It has quality control rules and regulations,” Monty Veazey, president and CEO of the Georgia Alliance of Community Hospitals, told State Affairs. “It protects a rural hospital from an ambulatory surgery center coming in and building next to it and drawing the paying patient out of the hospital into that ambulatory environment. That just kills a rural hospital.”
Jaimie Cavanaugh of the Institute for Justice disagrees.
She cited studies that show states with CON laws have 30% fewer rural hospitals per capita and 14% fewer rural ambulatory surgical centers per capita.
“Residents in CON states have to drive longer distances to access health care and face longer wait times in emergency departments,” Cavanaugh told the Senate study committee. “CON laws reduce access to care and suppressing the supply of healthcare harms patients and is bad for the economy.”
A complex history
CON has had a contentious existence almost from the time the Georgia General Assembly passed the law in 1979. Congress repealed the federal CON law in 1984, realizing it wasn’t working in the ever-changing health care landscape where new types of medical advances and facilities were continuously emerging.
In 1988, then-U.S. Rep Roy Rowland, a Democrat and family practice doctor in Dublin, Georgia, told his congressional colleagues of the “harmful impact” of CON on a rural hospital in his east Georgia district. While the federal version had ended, Rowland was determined to end the state-level CON laws.
The Georgia Public Policy Foundation recounted Rowland’s story in its "Economic Report on Georgia’s Certificate of Need Program."
At that time, Putnam General Hospital in Eatonton wanted to renovate its 20-year-old building. It would be financed by a 1-cent sales tax approved by the community. Under Georgia’s CON law, the proposed renovation needed approval from the state’s health planning agency. The state said it would deny it — unless the hospital eliminated 10 beds. The agency felt the hospital had too many beds for the area, even though the hospital wasn’t planning to add beds.
Eliminating the beds wouldn’t save money, Rowland said, but it would cut the number of licensed practical nurses being trained at the hospital. It would also cost the hospital money if it sought to regain those beds back through the CON program in the future.
“At first glance [CON] may have looked pretty good; however, the effect of [CON] on health care costs has been dubious, at best. And the program has certainly been insensitive in many instances to the true needs of our communities,” Rowland said.
By 1990, 11 states no longer had CON laws. South Carolina lawmakers overhauled their CON law this year (it sunsets in 2025), except for long-term care facilities.
As of January of this year, 35 states and Washington, D.C., have CON programs that vary by state, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Efforts to tweak or abolish the CON law in Georgia failed during the recent legislative session. Senate Republicans introduced two bills.
Senate Bill 99 would have exempted most rural hospitals from the CON law. It passed in the Senate but died in the House. Senate Bill 162 called for eliminating the law except for long-term care facilities. It never reached the Senate floor for a vote.
Now, the job of deciding CON’s fate lies with the Senate Study Committee on CON Reform and the House Study Committee on Certificate of Need Modernization. The House committee is set to meet July 13 at the Capitol. Both committees include a mix of lawmakers, physicians, insurance industry executives, medical school officials and top executives at the state’s top hospital chains.
Why It Matters
It may help to understand what’s going on in other parts of the country, especially when it comes to rural healthcare.
Eight rural hospitals have closed in Georgia over the last decade. Another 19, or 28%, are at risk of closing, according to the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform.
There are more rural hospitals in states without CON, Jaimie Cavanaugh of the Institute for Justice told Senate study committee members. Five states — Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Utah and Wyoming — without CON have had no rural hospital closings, Cavanaugh said. CON also keeps hospitals from growing. If you want to add services to a hospital, or bring other new medical innovations to an area, you have to get a Certificate of Need first, she said.
Atlanta health care attorney Barry Herrin has dealt with CON law for over 30 years. He has worked with doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers looking to build new facilities in Georgia, North Carolina, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama and Texas. Georgia has one of the most restrictive CON laws in the south, Herrin said.
Over the last decade, Herrin said he’s had “ three or four clients” who couldn’t build or expand in Georgia due to CON hurdles. They had projects ranging from ambulatory surgery centers, radiation therapy, facility expansions, a new specialized service or ownership change, which also requires getting a CON.
Georgia has 13 health care service delivery regions.
“The state decides what service delivery region you're in,” Herrin explained. “If you're in a region, and somebody in that region doesn't like what you’re doing. They can object.”
Existing hospitals have been known to oppose proposals in their areas. The case may end up in litigation or the project is withdrawn or denied.
Georgia’s CON law has kept birthing centers, free-standing emergency departments, radiation therapy treatment centers and new hospitals from opening, experts said.
Florida, for instance, has gained 64 ambulatory surgery centers since it repealed its CON laws in 2019, Chris Denson of Georgia Public Policy Foundation noted. Ambulatory surgery centers are more economical in Georgia, Dr. John Gleason of Resurgence Orthopedics told the Senate committee.
“Certificate of Need has a negative effect on the quality of services simply because [CON] reduces competition between hospitals,” Stratmann said. “And less competition is often associated with lower quality of service and higher costs.”
Having access to a variety of health care options isn’t the only issue.
The Kaiser Family Foundation found states with CON laws had 11% higher health care costs than those without.
It stymies competition, says one rural politician who has tried to get a hospital in his community.
“We just don't have any choice here and we have some of the highest health care costs in the nation,” Lee County Commission Chair Billy Mathis told State Affairs.
Lee County is among Georgia’s wealthiest counties, yet residents in this rural southwestern enclave have to travel to nearby Dougherty County to visit a hospital when they get sick or are in labor.
That trek is likely to continue for the foreseeable future for the county’s 33,000 residents. State regulators recently revoked Lee’s Certificate of Need after giving the county numerous extensions. The revocation essentially kills the county’s plans to build a 60-bed hospital, ending a five-year effort and $8 million court fight to make the proposed Lee County Medical Center a reality.
The ongoing legal feud over the proposed hospital delayed the ground-breaking and ultimately led to the project’s demise, Mathis said, adding, “Monopolies breed inefficiencies when you only have one hospital in the area,” Mathis said.
“We're not going to give up. I'm always hopeful that the Georgia Legislature will come to their senses and either do away with the Certificate of Need laws or amend them so you don't have to spend the first two or three or four years tied up in litigation,” said Mathis.
Some health care experts say expanding Medicaid would help alleviate the problems around CON and provide payment to rural hospitals that provide care to large numbers of uninsured and underinsured patients.
Georgia is among 10 states that have not expanded Medicaid, a possible solution to CON, some experts say.
More than 1 in 8 Georgians do not have health care coverage, according to Leah Chan, director of health justice at Georgia Budget and Policy Institute.
An estimated 1.3 million Georgians are uninsured, and Georgia’s uninsured rate of 13.7% is the third-highest in the nation. That rate is expected to climb to 1 in 4 uninsured Georgians in rural Georgia by 2026, GBPI said.
“The geographic burden is heaviest on Georgians living in rural communities,” Chan said. “As a state, we cannot have honest conversations about ensuring Georgians have access to affordable, high-quality health care without talking about full Medicaid expansion.”
Data from states that expanded Medicaid showed the expansion helped stabilize finances for hospitals and providers, particularly in rural areas.
“Some of these rural hospitals that may be suffering would all of a sudden have access to a large influx of cash and [would] not have to be covering poor folks by eating the bills,” Charles Bullock, University of Georgia political science professor, told State Affairs. “The amount of money, which would be available immediately, is in the billions of dollars.”
Any further talks regarding CON must include Medicaid expansion, Chan said. “Wherever we land with CON, it is clear that keeping our rural communities healthy means fully expanding Medicaid," she said.
Georgia has spent over $15.3 billion on Medicaid since 2018, Gov. Brian Kemp said in February.
“While the state spends more and more, Georgians aren’t seeing an improvement in care they receive,” the governor said. Instead of expanding the federal Medicaid program, Georgia has instituted a work-for-Medicaid program, which starts this month, for Georgians currently not in the program to qualify for health care.
In April, the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) announced final approval by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) of its revised Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) allocation methodology.
It’s part of a little-known federal Medicaid program, known as the “directed payment plan,” which will reallocate more than $100 million in Medicaid money from more prominent hospitals like Grady Memorial Hospital to the state’s 60 rural hospitals and 21 teaching hospitals.
“It has been the best-kept secret that is not a secret,” state Sen. Ben Watson, a Savannah-area physician who is a member of the Senate study committee, told State Affairs. “It is so beneficial to all the rural hospitals and all the teaching hospitals. So, instead of closing hospitals, this will keep hospitals open. This will make them profitable. The hospitals should do well, from that perspective; they won't be struggling.”
What’s Next?
For now, the CON debate continues as the Legislature’s two study committees work to figure out a solution.
The Senate study committee will host hearings in Columbus on Aug. 15 and Savannah in October. The committee returns to Atlanta for the final report in November. The House study committee will meet July 13 in Atlanta.
“Everybody’s in agreement (CON) needs to be tweaked,” Watson said. “The question is, do we still need it or not?”
Certificate of Need: By the Numbers
States with CON laws: 35 plus Washington, D.C.
States that have repealed CON laws*: 12
States with CON laws that exclude rural facilities or don't apply to hospitals: 9
States with vast rural areas that have ended CON programs entirely: 5
States that have had no rural hospital closures since 2005: 5
Rural hospitals that have closed in Georgia since 2005: 10
* 2022 data.
Source: National Conference of State Legislatures; Institute for Justice; Sheps Center at the University of North Carolina.
Have questions or comments about the Certificate of Need? Contact Tammy Joyner on Twitter @lvjoyner.
Twitter @StateAffairsGA
Facebook @stateaffairsUS
Instagram @stateaffairsGA
LinkedIn @stateaffairs
Header image: Fairview Park Hospital in Dublin, GA (Credit: Fairview Park Hospital)
Read more from our series on rural health care in Georgia.
And in case you missed it:
Read this story for free.
Create AccountRead this story for free
Create your free account or login to continue reading.
By submitting your information, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.
Latest Stories
Celebrating Jimmy Carter: 99 Years of dedication and service
As Oct. 1 approaches, we find ourselves on the cusp of a momentous day — the 99th birthday of the 39th president of the United States, James Earl “Jimmy” Carter Jr. Born in the small town of Plains, Georgia, in 1924, Carter’s journey from peanut farmer to the White House stands as a testament to the …
Georgia considering occupational licensing reform
The Gist
ATLANTA — As Georgia grapples with a severe workforce shortage, a Senate committee is looking at changing laws and policies that keep skilled professionals, including doctors and nurses, waiting a year or more to get to work.
What’s Happening
The Senate Study Committee on Occupational Licensing heard this week from several experts with insights into the bureaucratic barriers plaguing skilled workers.
Many occupational licenses in Georgia are issued by one of 43 licensing boards housed in the Professional Licensing Boards Division of the secretary of state’s office. They cover 197 license types, including cosmetologists, nurses, social workers, foresters, architects and plumbers. Other professions are regulated by independent state boards, including doctors, engineers and realtors.
About 30% of U.S. workers need a license to work, said Marc Hyden, director of state government affairs for R Street Institute, a public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C.
Hyden praised recent laws passed in Georgia that have expedited the process for veterans and military spouses with professional skills to obtain licenses when they move into the state. But he said more reforms are needed.
The licensing division is understaffed and underfunded, Hyden said, and receives only $8.5 million of the $24 million it generates from licensing fees. This lack of resources prevents some boards from providing timely and efficient service, he said, creating a backlog of prospective skilled workers.
About 27% of professional license applications administered by the Professional Licensing Board Division take a year or more to process, according to the secretary of state. The rest can take up to six months. Some boards are relying on paper applications, mail service and manual processes to handle applications.
Why It Matters
Hyden noted that other states manage to issue licenses within 30 days, in part because their boards are better staffed and meet more often — monthly, instead of quarterly, as with some Georgia boards.
Georgia is enjoying record economic growth. Over the last four years, the state has attracted over 1,700 economic development projects, $65 billion in investment and 165,000 jobs, according to the Georgia Chamber of Commerce.
But the state’s workforce can’t supply enough workers to meet the growing number of job opportunities. There is only one job seeker for every three job postings, the Chamber said.
Among jobs in highest demand in Georgia are registered nurses, pharmacists, accountants, construction contractors and truck drivers – all of which require state licenses. Many workers now in these fields are nearing retirement.
According to the Georgia Health Care Workforce Commission, 20% of health care workers are over age 55 and looking to retire in the next 10 years. About 4% of the health care workforce leaves annually and is not being replaced by new graduates.
Most of the state is medically underserved, with 65 of Georgia’s 159 counties without a pediatrician, 82 counties without an obstetrician and 90 without a psychiatrist.
To draw more people into skilled professions, “we need to think creatively … and improve licensing,” said Daniela Perry, vice president of the Chamber.
What’s Next
One area ripe for reform is how the state handles licensing of professionals who come to Georgia from other states and countries.
Since 2019, 22 U.S. states have adopted universal license recognition laws that establish a streamlined process to recognize professional licenses issued by another state. If the applicant holds a license in good standing and has no pending disciplinary actions or a disqualifying criminal record in one state, they can practice in another.
This year Georgia passed HB 155, which allows licensing boards to grant licenses to some out-of-state professionals if the license they hold is “substantially similar” in qualifications and scope to what Georgia requires.
The Georgia law is more restrictive than those in other states, which only call for “similar” qualifications and don’t require residency, said Austen Bannan, an employment expert with Americans for Prosperity. Other states allow years of professional experience to stand in for some training requirements. Georgia doesn’t, mandating seasoned skilled tradespeople pursue hundreds or thousands of hours of additional training.
“The idea is not to force people to relearn their skill set,” Bannan said.
Georgia is also missing out on the skills of many foreign-trained professionals due to its stringent licensing requirements, said Darlene Lynch, who chairs the Business & Immigration for Georgia Partnership, which works to enhance economic development by tapping into the skills of immigrants.
Georgia’s foreign-born population has grown by 90% over the last 20 years, and 10% of Georgians — more than a million people — are now foreign born, she said, adding that half are naturalized citizens, and a third have college or graduate degrees.
Though 1 in 5 doctors in Georgia is foreign-born, Lynch said, “Too often we’re watching doctors driving Ubers, dentists working behind a CVS counter, a welder working at a poultry plant — they’re not going back to the field where they have the most experience.”
She urged the committee to adopt the licensing practices of other states, which recognize the medical credentials of foreign-born physicians and other health care professionals, and develop expedited pathways for other skilled immigrants to become licensed.
“We have a pool of talent that other states don’t have to draw upon,” Lynch said.
Sen. Larry Walker III, R-Perry, chair of the occupational licensing committee, said many of the issues raised at the meeting this week have come up at the GA WORKS Commission, an effort led by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger this year to slash bureaucratic barriers in occupational licensing. That includes a total revamp of the application process, which is projected to be fully digitized by spring 2024.
“We’ve got to get into the modern world with this licensing issue if we’re going to continue to grow our economy,” Walker said.
Have questions, comments or tips? Contact Jill Jordan Sieder on X @journalistajill or at [email protected].
X @STATEAFFAIRSGA
Facebook @STATEAFFAIRSGA
Instagram @STATEAFFAIRSGA
LinkedIn @STATEAFFAIRS
Header photo: Some foreign-trained doctors and other health professionals wait for years for approval to practice in Georgia, due to the state’s demanding occupational licensure requirements. (Credit: baona)
Jimmy Carter’s 99th birthday bash swings into high gear Saturday
Key takeaways: Birthday celebrations for Jimmy Carter, Georgia’s most famous native son and the nation’s oldest-living president, will take place Saturday to avoid the threat of a looming partial federal government shutdown. James Earl Carter Jr. turns 99 on Sunday, the day the federal government is set to shutdown if federal lawmakers don’t reach an …
Senate study committee hears suggestions to improve Georgia foster care
The Gist
ATLANTA — College-bound Halle Mickel gave state lawmakers on Tuesday a compelling glimpse into Georgia’s foster care system.
The 19-year-old who has seven siblings in five different homes told the Senate Foster Care and Adoption Study Committee how her family’s life has been “turned upside down” ever since they were separated last April. She sees her siblings once a week. Sometimes, those visits are canceled because child welfare workers aren’t prepared, she said.
“The pain it caused not only my mom but me felt horrible,” she said. “Watching them cry as they have to leave my mom and go home to a stranger. Seeing my siblings not getting the proper hygiene care they need and so much more. Like many others, my family has been torn to pieces by the child welfare system due to struggling with poverty and being in need of immediate help. Parents aren’t always at fault when DFCS is involved.”
Mickel’s story was included among more than four hours of testimony from advocates and experts in the foster care, child welfare and family court fields. Tuesday’s session focused primarily on finding solutions for Georgia’s taxed foster care system.
What’s Happening
Georgia has about 11,000 children in foster care, committee chair Sen. Kay Kirkpatrick told State Affairs in a post-hearing interview Tuesday. Many are in the system due to abuse, neglect, family drug addiction, violence and other hardships.
Georgia’s foster care system is stretched so thin that children in foster care in Georgia spend about two years in the system — nearly three months longer than the national average of 21.7 months, according to The Council of State Governments Southern Office.
Often there aren’t enough families to take in children so many end up in hotels or offices as a result, Candice Broce, head of Georgia Family and Children Services, recently told the committee.
Broce was back before the committee Tuesday with good news. The foster care system reached a milestone on Sept. 8, when no foster children were reported staying in hotels or offices, she said. Since then, the agency has only used hoteling in a few emergency cases, she noted.
Still, Tuesday’s testimonies showed Georgia is spending more money troubleshooting and intervening rather than preventing children from having to go into the foster care system.
About $538 million in state and federal money is spent on Georgia’s foster care system. The bulk of that — $498.5 million — goes to intervention and late intervention programs, according to Voices for Georgia’s Children, a nonprofit child policy and advocacy group.
“In Georgia, we allocate around 20% of Title IV funding towards prevention while the majority of resources are funneled into the foster care and adoption industry,” said Sarah Winograd of Together With Families, an advocacy group for families in the child welfare system.
“While the majority of the resources are funneled into the foster care and adoption industry,” Winograd told the committee. “It’s an industry. Consider the numbers: a staggering $32,000 per year to keep one child separated from their family and in foster care.”
It costs her organization “a mere $500 to $1,500 per child in assistance and resources at Together with Families to prevent foster care and help families improve their own lives,”she said.
Why It Matters
The committee heard suggestions to help Georgia focus more on prevention rather than intervention. Among the suggestions:
- Issue state identification cards to foster children. Often kids are removed from their homes during chaotic situations leaving birth certificates and other import documents unavailable to them. Children would be issued a state ID within 90 days of entering the foster care system, displaying information such as the child’s Medicaid number. It would enable older children in the system to get jobs and perform other vital daily tasks. The cost would run about $5 a child. “That should be something that’s not too difficult to achieve,” Kirkpatrick said.
- Use the Safe Babies approach in Georgia courts. Between 2011 and 2018, Georgia saw a 44% increase in infants and toddlers entering foster care, more than any other Southern state. As a result, it needs a more collaborative, family-based approach to dealing with the youngest children in foster care, such as the Safe Babies approach used in Iowa. Iowa’s infant courts are adorned with quilts, diapers, toys and books, to help alleviate the trauma experienced by toddlers and infants in the court system. In a recent visit, Georgia officials saw how one Iowa judge, his court staff and attorneys dealt with a mother who became distraught during the hearing. The judge stopped the hearing, allowing attorneys and other staff to embrace the woman. The DFCS case manager and defense attorney told the woman they were there to help her figure out ways to keep her baby. “That’s super important. It’s been successful in other states,” Kirkpatrick said.
- Use opioid settlement money to finance foster care needs. Kirkpatrick called it a good idea but “it might not be that easy to accomplish. It’s not really under the legislature’s control.”
What’s Next?
Kirkpatrick, a Republican and retired orthopedic surgeon who practiced in metro Atlanta for over 30 years, called Tuesday’s hearing extremely productive.
“I thought it was another great meeting,” she said. “We work pretty hard to get input from all the different groups. We won’t make our decisions about which things to tackle until we finish [all of] our meetings. We have one more where we’ll be getting some testimony.”
The senate committee’s next meeting is in Columbus on Oct. 26. It will focus on adoption.
“After that, we’ll get together and figure out what our legislative priorities are going to be,” Kirkpatrick said.
Want to know how many foster children have been placed in foster homes outside of your county? Go to seetheneed.org to find out. See The Need was created by Alpharetta-based FaithBridge Foster Care to raise awareness about foster care in America.
Have questions, comments or tips? Contact Tammy Joyner on X @lvjoyner or at [email protected].
X @StateAffairsGA
Instagram@StateAffairsGA
Facebook @StateAffairsGA
LinkedIn @StateAffairs
Header image: The Senate Study Committee on Foster Care and Adoption held their second meeting at the Capitol to hear testimony from citizens, nonprofits and state agency representatives. (Credit: Georgia Senate)