Open primaries initiative makes the ballot

The Make Elections Fair campaign submitted over 580,000 signatures to the Secretary of State’s office to qualify their proposal for the November ballot on Wednesday. The bipartisan initiative aims to implement open primary elections and ban taxpayer funding for state elections. The initiative establishes an open, nonpartisan primary election, enabling all candidates to compete regardless of party ties. “Let all candidates compete, let the voters choose freely and let the best candidates win,” Chair of the Make Elections Fair AZ Sarah Smallhouse said in a press release. Their campaign has raised over $7.5 million, Smallhouse said. “The two parties are so antagonistic that any compromise is considered traitorous,” Former Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, a Democrat, said. “Instead of governing, our representatives give us partisan gridlock.” The Make Elections Fair initiative “levels the playing field” and would require candidates to appeal to the majority of voters, thus better representing Arizonans, Goddard said. "This initiative marks a transformative moment for Arizona and sets a precedent for electoral fairness nationwide,” policy consultant Chuck Coughlin said. “It’s time to ensure every Arizonan has an equal voice in our democratic process and is treated as individuals and not as captives of a political party.

Abortion Access campaign flexes its 823K signatures

Arizona for Abortion Access submitted signatures to qualify the Arizona Abortion Access Act for the November ballot Wednesday. Organizers said they submitted more than 823,000 signatures from registered voters, which would be a record for signatures submitted for a citizen’s initiative. Petition organizers held a rally at the Capitol to announce the number of signatures they collected and march in support of the initiative. In the 2020 presidential election, 3.3 million people cast their votes in the state. The minimum number of signatures to get an initiative on the ballot is 383,923. “This is what a winning campaign looks like. This is what democracy looks like,” said Vira Hernandez, one of the organizers of the citizen’s initiative. Dr. Paul Isaacson, a Phoenix-based obstetrician and gynecologist, said Arizona’s 15-week abortion ban is “unacceptable.” “Fifteen weeks is a completely arbitrary point that doesn’t relate to any specific milestone in fetal development,” Isaacson said. “Many of the medical complications that can lead to the need for an abortion don’t occur or might not be discovered before 15 weeks.” Isaacson also pushed back against an argument that many opponents have said the initiative would lead to late-term abortions right before birth. “There are no clinics in Arizona or anywhere in America that perform abortions immediately before birth,” Isaacson said. Many Republicans including Toma have taken issue with the language of the initiative, which would legalize abortion up until the 24th week of pregnancy or after if it is in the interest of the mother’s physical or mental health. “Their measure effectively would just mean your local Planned Parenthood employee can tell you ‘Oh, yep. You're mentally stressed out.’ So therefore, that's a reason to have an abortion in well into the ninth month,” Toma said. “I mean, that is unconscionable to me.”

And here’s the counterclaim

Speakers for a counter campaign to the Arizona Abortion Access Act, dubbed “It Goes Too Far,” said the proposed amendment to abortion law is not being portrayed accurately to voters on Wednesday. Attendees held signs that said “read the language, it goes too far.” The opposition’s speakers said that the proposal would reinstate a "Roe v. Wade type law" but also remove existing safety measures for abortion procedures. “Arizona voters are not being given the facts about this amendment, so they can't make a decision about what they're comfortable with,” It Goes Too Far spokeswoman Joanna De La Cruz said. The initiative used “vague language” to describe who can perform abortions, attorney Dawn Grove said, putting women at risk of unsafe procedures. Their campaign will spend the next few months educating voters on the proposition and how it would change the state’s abortion law, Cindy Dahlgren of It Goes Too Far said. “Those signatures will not translate to votes,” Dahlgren said of the more than 823,000 signatures the Arizona for Abortion Access campaign submitted Wednesday morning. Dahlgren noted that their campaign is particularly concerned about the proposal being voter-protected, making it harder to change. "Enshrining bad law into the Constitution is not the solution," she said. “We have a huge volunteer effort, we already have over 3000 volunteers across the state of every single county and it's just continuing to grow,” De La Cruz said, but she declined to share how much money their campaign has raised so far.

The Make Elections Complicated campaign gets their signatures

The Make Elections Fair campaign submitted over 580,000 signatures to the Secretary of State’s office to qualify their proposal for the November ballot on Wednesday. The bipartisan initiative aims to implement open primary elections and ban taxpayer funding for state elections. The initiative establishes an open, nonpartisan primary election, enabling all candidates to compete regardless of party ties. “Let all candidates compete, let the voters choose freely and let the best candidates win,” Chair of the Make Elections Fair AZ Sarah Smallhouse said in a press release. Their campaign has raised over $7.5 million, Smallhouse said. “The two parties are so antagonistic that any compromise is considered traitorous,” Former Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, a Democrat, said. “Instead of governing, our representatives give us partisan gridlock.” The Make Elections Fair initiative “levels the playing field” and would require candidates to appeal to the majority of voters, thus better representing Arizonans, Goddard said. "This initiative marks a transformative moment for Arizona and sets a precedent for electoral fairness nationwide,” policy consultant Chuck Coughlin said. “It’s time to ensure every Arizonan has an equal voice in our democratic process and is treated as individuals and not as captives of a political party.”

Sinema Fourth of July Statement

WASHINGTON – Arizona senior Senator Kyrsten Sinema released the following statement in advance of Independence Day:   “I wish all Arizonans a happy and safe Fourth of July as we celebrate America’s Independence and honor the courage and sacrifice of American servicemembers, veterans, and their families.”

Joint Legislative Committee on Water Security Finds SB 1221 Would Have “Stopped the Bleeding” in Rural Groundwater Basins

PHOENIX, ARIZONA— Members of the Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Water Security heard emotional testimony on Friday from Arizona farmers who detailed the hard work and concessions they made to negotiate key provisions of SB 1221. If adopted, the measure would have allowed the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources to permanently close the Willcox, Hualapai, and Gila Bend groundwater basins to new groundwater pumping and required all existing pumping to be reduced by 10% over 10 years, with the opportunity for up to 15% over 20 years. "We heard testimony from stakeholders and the Department of Water Resources that verifies passing SB 1221 would have stopped the bleeding in these critical groundwater basins," said Senator Sine Kerr, co-sponsor of the bill and Chair of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Energy & Water. "Passing SB 1221 would have allowed the Director to permanently close the Willcox, Hualapai, and Gila Bend basins to all new pumping, which would prevented new and existing users from increasing the total amount of groundwater that could be withdrawn from these basins. This is what the local people have been asking for, so they can work on improving groundwater conditions in the basin." "While radical out-of-state environmental groups have played politics with Arizona’s critical groundwater supplies, Republicans have offered meaningful solutions to help address our state’s most pressing groundwater issues, including stopping new groundwater resources from being used," said Representative Gail Griffin, co-sponsor of the bill and Chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources, Energy & Water. "This includes HB 2060, which would have allowed voters to establish an emergency Irrigation Non-Expansion Area in the Willcox basin, and HB 2022, which would have allowed the voters to establish a Domestic Water Improvement District in the Willcox Basin. This year, we introduced many bills to help address groundwater issues throughout the state, including SB 1221 and others. Another bill, HB 2063, would have given each owner of a domestic well in the state a certificated groundwater right, but Governor Hobbs vetoed that bill." "SB 1221 is the most comprehensive piece of groundwater legislation offered since the 1980 Groundwater Management Act," said Representative Tim Dunn, Yuma farmer and former Chair of the House Committee on Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs. "There’s no law in Arizona allowing a basin to be completely closed or requiring existing users to reduce groundwater use. Not even Active Management Areas require these stipulations. SB 1221 represents the first time in our state’s history where rural farmers have come together and said, 'We’re willing to be regulated; we’re willing to put reductions on ourselves if you’re willing to listen to us on the maximum amount that can be done without putting us out of business.' That has never happened before." "We had an opportunity this year to permanently close three critical groundwater basins to all new groundwater pumping and to require mandatory groundwater reductions of 10% over 10 years, with the opportunity for up to 15% over 20 years," said Senator T.J. Shope, Pinal County resident and Vice-Chair of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Energy &Water. "Each year these basins aren’t closed, additional groundwater can be pumped from the basin. We must close the basins so people can begin to work on improving the aquifer without new users coming in." Video of Friday’s meeting is posted here.

Homelessness Not a Crime Despite SCOTUS Ruling

TUCSON, ARIZONA – Unhoused people who sleep outside will not be treated as criminals in Pima County despite the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing cities to punish people for sleeping outdoors, Pima County Attorney Laura Conover and Pima County Supervisors Chair Adelita Grijalva said in a Tuesday news conference. Conover opened the news conference by noting that the ruling is flawed for several reasons:

  • It falsely suggests that we can arrest our way out of chronic homelessness, substance use disorders, or mental illness,
  • It is an unfunded idea that local police and prosecutors have no extra capacity to deal with, and
  • It distracts from city and county efforts to address illness, housing, and poverty which are starting to lead to a decline in both homelessness and overdose deaths.

“Most importantly, the Supreme Court is wrong. Morally, ethically wrong,” Conover said.  “Despite the overwhelming challenges of COVID, homelessness, crime, and fentanyl, Pima County never lost sight of humanity, and I’m here to make sure we don’t.  While the Supreme Court is willing to tolerate cruelty, this community will not.” The recent SCOTUS decision known as Johnson v. City of Grants Pass overturned an earlier ruling by the 9

th

 Circuit Court of Appeals prohibiting cities from criminally charging unhoused people when there is no shelter available to them. Grijalva said the ruling is fundamentally flawed. “I want to make one thing very clear: we cannot arrest our way out of the problem facing our community members and many other communities across the nation,” she said.  “Being unhoused is not a crime.” Pima County struggles with affordable housing and the funding needed to reduce or eliminate acute or chronic homelessness, Grijalva said. “I am pleased that Pima County has a longstanding policy to provide assistance and resources to those who find shelter in an encampment, and work to find relocation before requiring people to leave an area,” Grijalva said. “The Supreme Court ruling will not affect our efforts to continue seeking humane and just ways to work with individuals facing this issue.” During the Q&A session, County officials were on hand to answer questions, video of the press conference can be found at this

 link.

PCAO Summer Law Clerk Natalia Erickson compiled a list of LGBTQIA+ safe housing options to share with the public. We also have other available service options listed 

here

.

Arizona for Abortion Access submits most voter signatures in state history

PHOENIX – Arizona for Abortion Access announced on Wednesday that they submitted a record breaking 823,685 signatures toward a Constitutional amendment enshrining the right to access abortion on the November ballot. That number represents one out of every five Arizona voters and is more than double the number of signatures required for a citizens initiative. “This is the most signatures ever gathered for a ballot measure in Arizona history, which is a testament to the broad support among Arizona voters for restoring and protecting abortion access in Arizona,” said Cheryl Bruce, campaign manager of Arizona for Abortion Access. When it is passed by voters in November, the Arizona Abortion Access Act will enshrine a right to abortion in the state constitution and prevent the state from passing laws that restrict access to abortion before fetal viability or after that point to protect the health and life of the pregnant patient. Signatures were gathered by more than 7,000 volunteers across all 15 Arizona counties in support of the amendment. On trailheads, in coffee shops, book stores, and public events, signature-gatherers were overwhelmed by support in all demographic groups. “After spending several months talking to voters across the political spectrum, from age 18 to 80, I have no doubt that Arizona voters will overwhelmingly pass the Arizona Abortion Access Act. Arizonans will finally be able to trust that our reproductive freedoms are restored and protected in our state constitution,” said Susan Ashley, a volunteer signature collector who began collecting signatures in January. Advocates of reproductive freedom say that abortion bans, like the extreme ban currently in place in Arizona, fail to recognize the reality that “every pregnancy is different and every woman deserves the best care suited to her situation,” said Dr. Paul Isaacson, an Arizona OB/GYN of 30 years. “Anti-abortion extremists peddle lies about safety, why women seek abortion and who can perform abortion. The fact is, abortion care remains as safe under the Arizona Abortion Access Act as it is now; it’s a decision women do not take lightly, and it’s basic healthcare that patients need to access whether they are surivors of sexual assault, experiencing medical complications or for countless other valid reasons no arbitrary, extreme ban can possibly account for.” Arizona currently has an extreme abortion ban with no exceptions for rape, incest or medical complications. “Arizona women do not want to live in 1864 or 1964. We want to make our own decisions about pregnancy and abortion with our doctors and families, not judges or politicians,” said Chris Love, spokesperson for Arizona for Abortion Access. At the campaign’s signature turn-in event, several Arizona women shared their personal experiences needing abortion care. “The consequences of an illegal abortion continue to haunt my family,” Lake Havasu abortion patient Pamela Hill said. “I hope my story of the physical and emotional pain caused by abortion bans sends a message: every pregnancy is different, every patient is different, and every woman deserves access to appropriate care, not dangerous restrictions.” These experiences have made Hill determined to fight so that others don’t share the same traumas today as she did prior to Roe v. Wade. “We must vote to restore and protect the right to abortion,” she said. In addition to the historic number of signatures, Arizona for Abortion Access has seen robust fundraising from supporters across the state and the country. The campaign has received donations from more than 13,000 unique grassroots donors with an average donation of $43. Earlier this month, they also announced the planned launch of a $15 million bilingual television and radio ad campaign targeting voters in Phoenix and Tucson. The campaign is endorsed by more than 40 state and national organizations representing the faith community, the Latino community, labor unions, indigenous groups, reproductive rights organizations, veterans groups, voter advocacy organizations and many others. “There’s no question that Arizonans across the political spectrum see reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy as central to their fundamental rights,” said Chris Love. “That includes the freedom to access abortion and keep politicians out of our private and personal healthcare decisions, once and for all.” To learn more and access the Arizona for Abortion Access press kit, 

visit our website

. For a video stream of today's press conference, 

watch here

.

New center to help lead national Indigenous language revitalization efforts

TUCSON, Ariz. — A new center at the University of Arizona is one of only four designated by the U.S. Department of Education to lead a collective effort to empower tribal communities across the country to revitalize and maintain their languages. The Department of Education began funding the new West Region Native American Language Resource Center in the fall. The new center, administratively housed in the university's American Indian Language Development Institute and physically located in the 

College of Education

, is one of four inaugural centers doing similar work at other institutions. The others are a national center at the University of Hawai'i and three regional centers at the University of Oregon and Little Priest Tribal College in Winnebago, Nebraska. The U of A center will primarily serve Indigenous communities in Arizona, California, Nevada and Utah. All four centers are already working collaboratively to promote a collective approach to service and assistance to existing language programs and those in development. A track record of tribal language revitalization The new center will be largely an extension of what the university's American Indian Language Development Institute, or AILDI, has been doing for decades. Established in 1978 and housed in the College of Education since 1990, AILDI's core programming involves bringing tribal members to campus for workshops to promote the use of tribal languages as a key aspect of revitalization efforts.

Ofelia Zepeda

, a Regents Professor of linguistics and director of AILDI, serves as co-principal investigator for the new center. 

Sheilah E. Nicholas

, a professor in the College of Education and AILDI faculty member, will serve as center director. Zepeda and Nicholas have a decades-long track record of helping tribal communities revitalize and promote the use of their languages, making AILDI the perfect home for the new center. "When we looked at the call for proposals for the grant, the things it listed were the things we were doing for years," said Zepeda, a renowned Tohono O'odham linguist who wrote the first grammar book in the Tohono O'odham language. The grant will also pay for much of the training for tribal communities. The new center will more formally establish the network of partnerships across tribal communities and other institutions that have applied the AILDI model in service to local tribal community language revitalization efforts: the University of Oregon's Northwest Indigenous Language Institute, and the Hopilavayi Summer Institute from 2004 to 2010 in the Hopi community in northeastern Arizona, Nicholas said. Partnerships with tribes that tailor Indigenous language education to each community will be the core of the center's work, Zepeda and Nicholas said, adding that each community has unique linguistic needs that are deeply linked to geographic location. The western United States is the most linguistically diverse region in the U.S., with California alone being home to more than 100 Indigenous languages, Nicholas said. "Enumeration has always been a curiosity from the outside," she said, driven by many linguists' narrow view of how language is used. "If we can shift and show the vitality, it broadens the definition of language – it's not just a form that people use to communicate on a daily basis. That's often the measure, but there's many different kinds of forms, such as prayers and songs, that still use the language." Much of the center's programming will involve an instructional technique known as Indigenous language immersion, which Nicholas has taught to tribal educators since the 1990s. Indigenous language immersion involves developing teaching methods that use the language as the medium of instruction 50 to 100% of the time. These techniques, influenced by French immersion in Canada, were first applied by the Mohawk Indigenous community in North America, and later became an Indigenous language immersion school movement for the Hawai'ian language and Māori, the language of the Indigenous Polynesian people of New Zealand. The new center has the potential to support this growing movement, Zepeda and Nicholas said. AILDI has helped implement Indigenous language immersion instruction in communities across the U.S., and the new center will allow the institute to expand support of community language revitalization efforts into the education systems serving Indigenous communities, Zepeda and Nicholas said. One

 

challenge for Indigenous language teachers, who are often so busy working in the classroom, is finding enough time and resources to evaluate their curriculums and show how effective they are. "One question we always get from educators is, 'I see why we should do this, but where is the buy-in among decision-makers?'" Nicholas said. Emerging research, she added, confirms that Indigenous language immersion education is not subtractive but additive – students are not only academically excelling but also learning their community's ancestral language and developing a strong cultural identity and a desire to give back. A network of experts for tribal linguists Growing up on the Tohono O'odham Nation, Ronald Geronimo learned O'odham as his first language and uses it every day. Many O'odham children today do not speak the language fluently and only know a few vocabulary words, Geronimo said. "Now, children look at the language as something only adults know or use," Geronimo said. "Some of them think that you don't learn the language until you get older because they only see older people speaking it." As co-director of Tohono O'odham Community College's O'odham Ñi'okǐ Ki:, or O'odham Language Center, Geronimo helps lead a mission to "reclaim" the O'odham language – returning its usage to everyday life. To do that, Geronimo and his colleagues at the center have developed programs to teach O'odham to children in schools and immerse students in the language. Geronimo has partnered for years with AILDI to develop the center's programs. They include partnering O'odham language experts with elementary educators to help them teach courses in the language, as well as teaching parents who may also not be fluent how to use the language more often around their children at home. "We're trying to have a comprehensive approach, not just to doing immersion in the school but also with the parents and in the communities with the overall goal of having the child grow up seeing the language," he said. The federal grant that established the new center, Geronimo said, will provide a valuable network where he and other tribal linguists can connect and share resources toward a shared goal to support Indigenous language revitalization. "We'll have a lot more resources to do what we want to do, and maybe we don't have the funding to do it, but maybe they can assist in that way," Geronimo said. "It's a good thing to have that expertise available." Ultimately, Zepeda said, how the center works will be largely up to the tribal communities that come to use its resources. "We'll have our own ideas to meet the obligations of the grant," Zepeda said. "But we'll also be listening to the communities about what they want and what they need."

Construction set to begin on I-40/US 93 Kingman interchange

PHOENIX – Work is scheduled to get underway Thursday, July 11, on a free-flowing interchange connecting US 93 and Interstate 40 in Kingman.   The $106 million project is planned to eliminate delays that can occur for passenger and truck traffic on the main route between Las Vegas and Arizona. While traffic now must stop at a traffic signal where Beale Street intersects with I-40, a system-to-system interchange will feature ramps that allow traffic to flow freely.   Those new ramps will create one new mile of highway between I-40 and US 93, running northwest of the existing interchange at I-40 and Beale Street. Other project features include:

  • Widening more than one mile of I-40 in both directions between the new interchange and Stockton Hill Road
  • Adding a merge lane on US 93 northbound
  • Widening and/or rehabilitating four bridges on I-40
  • Building sound walls along a portion of I-40 to the west of Stockton Hill Road
  • Constructing drainage features

  For more information on the Kingman interchange project and to subscribe for updates, please visit

azdot.gov/WestKingmanTI

. Visitors to the webpage can also watch a flyover video simulation of what the project will look like upon completion.   This project is among several underway or planned to improve US 93, which travels 200 miles between Wickenburg and the Nevada line at Hoover Dam. In addition to constructing the Kingman interchange, ADOT's long-term vision calls for a four-lane divided highway through the entire 200 miles between Wickenburg and Nevada. Since 1999, ADOT has completed 19 projects to modernize US 93 between Wickenburg and I-40.   A current US 93 project near Wickenburg is now more than halfway done as work continues to transform a 5-mile section of two-lane roadway into a four-lane divided highway. Work on the Wickenburg-area project is expected to continue through this year, with lane restrictions limited to overnight hours to minimize traffic impacts. More information is available at

azdot.gov/US93Wickenburg

.   ADOT’s Five-Year Transportation Facilities Construction Program for 2025-2029 has these additional projects scheduled to convert segments US 93 to four-lane divided highway: mileposts 106-109.5. in the Cane Springs area; mileposts 190.5-193.5 in the Vista Royale area northwest of Wickenburg; and mileposts 161.7-166.2 in the area of Big Jim Wash.   For more information on other current and planned improvement projects in northwestern Arizona, please visit the

Northwest Regional Improvements US 93 and I-40 webpage

.

Your search query contained invalid characters or was empty. Please try again with a valid query.