Arizona Physicians Celebrate 822,460 Signatures to Put Arizona Abortion Access Act on the Ballot

PHOENIX, Ariz. —  Today, Arizona for Abortion Access turned in 822,460 signatures to get the Arizona Abortion Access Act on the ballot in November — the most signatures ever collected in the state’s history. In response, Dr. Cadey Harrel, a family physician in Tucson and Arizona Lead for the Committee to Protect Health Care, released the following statement: “Physicians stand with the 822,460 Arizonans who want the opportunity to restore and protect our freedom to make our own health care decisions without government interference. Doctors know that decisions around pregnancy and abortion are deeply personal, and should be made by patients, their families, and their physicians — not politicians. That’s why over 550 medical professionals in Arizona have 

signed a letter

 endorsing the Arizona Abortion Access Act. Arizona physicians and voters are speaking loud and clear: It’s time to take back our bodily autonomy, our health, and our freedom.” Dr. Harrel is available for media interviews by Zoom or phone from 2-5pm PT. To coordinate an interview please contact Jodi Helsel at 

[email protected]

.

Medical & Legal Experts Join It Goes Too Far Campaign in Confirming Dangers of the Proposed Abortion Amendment

Phoenix – Today, members of the medical and legal communities joined the It Goes Too Far campaign in confirming the extent of the problems with the proposed abortion amendment and the dangers it poses to girls, women, viable fetuses, parents, and taxpayers.   Arizona licensed attorney, Dawn Grove, warned voters who signed the petition believing the amendment reinstates a Roe v Wade type law, that this amendment goes far beyond Roe. Grove said that it will be the courts’ interpretation of the language that will matter, and they will see the loopholes that demand abortion without limits and without most safety regulations.   “The exemption for late-term abortion is so broad that it includes virtually any reason. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that late term abortions can be performed under the “mental health” exemption for financial reasons, family issues, stress or anxiety, anything related to her wellbeing. That is the precedent Arizona courts will look to under this amendment.”   Grove pointed to the vague language used to address who can perform abortions, “Consider the amendment uses the term “treating healthcare professional” instead of doctor or physician. Without defining who among the many ‘healthcare professionals’ listed under Arizona law can provide abortions, it leaves one to wonder why proponents included chiropractors, podiatrists, and veterinarians. This is not taking the health and safety of girls and women seriously.”   Recently retired OB-GYN from Prescott, Dr. Melinda Martin, knows the dangers of removing the doctor from the doctor-patient relationship and leaving girls and women to take chemical abortion pills without medical oversight. Dr. Martin warns, “They will be tempted to order the pills through the mail, take them without anyone knowing, and without a doctor. Those girls and women will be alone and likely unable to get the help they need if they run into a problem. This frightens me, knowing young women will be fooled into thinking a chemical abortion lacks health risks, and they will end up in a life-threatening situation.”   One of the greatest risks of taking the abortion pills without doctor oversight is taking it when a woman has an ectopic pregnancy. Michelle Tussing, a Registered Nurse at Choices Pregnancy Centers said they have discovered nine ectopic pregnancies in the last eight months. If those women had taken the abortion pill, they would have been in great danger, “Abortion pills cause pain and bleeding. Ectopic pregnancies cause pain and bleeding. It’s imperative that women know basic facts about their pregnancies before taking abortion pills. This amendment would remove these safety measures from women.”   Several commonsense safety precautions have already fallen in Michigan after that state passed a similar amendment less than two years ago, including informed consent, required clinic reporting of complications and deaths, and doctor oversight. And now the ACLU, citing the abortion amendment, is suing that state to force taxpayers to fund abortions.   It Goes Too Far spokeswoman, Joanna De La Cruz encouraged voters to read the amendment for themselves and noted, “Ninety percent of Arizona voters support limits on abortion at 15 weeks or earlier. So, the abortion amendment campaign doesn’t want voters to know that Arizona law already allows abortion up to 15 weeks – and beyond for medical emergencies. They don’t want voters to know that miscarriage care and ectopic pregnancy care are already protected under Arizona law and are not abortion – a fact even AG Kris Mayes affirmed last week.   The deceit and the misinformation being sown by the abortion amendment campaign is outrageous and offensive. They know Arizona voters wouldn’t support the amendment if they were honest about how far it goes.”   Learn more at ItGoesTooFar.com

Early Voting for the July 30, 2024 Primary Starts Today!

July 3, 2024 (Phoenix, Arizona) – There is no better way to honor Independence Day than to cast your ballot in the July 2024 Primary Election. People registered to vote by July 1, can vote early beginning today from the comfort of their home, vacation rental, or in person at a Maricopa County Vote Center. Registered voters can visit 

BeBallotReady.Vote

 to make a special request for a ballot to be mailed to their home or, for those enjoying cooler weather elsewhere, to a temporary residence. Voters registered with a party, and on the Active Early Voting List, will automatically receive a ballot in the mail. If registered as Independent (Party Not Designated), the voter will need to request which party’s ballot they want to vote online at 

BeBallotReady.Vote

 or by calling 602-506-1511. If voting early and in person, visit 

Locations.Maricopa.Vote

 to find the closest Vote Center. Independents will tell the poll worker which ballot they want to vote. To learn about each of these options, check out a new video just released by Maricopa County Elections that helps explains everything people need to know about the

 2024 Primary Election!

Early Voting for the July 30, 2024 Primary Starts Today!

July 3, 2024 (Phoenix, Arizona) – There is no better way to honor Independence Day than to cast your ballot in the July 2024 Primary Election. People registered to vote by July 1, can vote early beginning today from the comfort of their home, vacation rental, or in person at a Maricopa County Vote Center.   Registered voters can visit 

BeBallotReady.Vote

 to make a special request for a ballot to be mailed to their home or, for those enjoying cooler weather elsewhere, to a temporary residence. Voters registered with a party, and on the Active Early Voting List, will automatically receive a ballot in the mail. If registered as Independent (Party Not Designated), the voter will need to request which party’s ballot they want to vote online at 

BeBallotReady.Vote

 or by calling 602-506-1511. If voting early and in person, visit 

Locations.Maricopa.Vote

 to find the closest Vote Center. Independents will tell the poll worker which ballot they want to vote.   To learn about each of these options, check out a new video just released by Maricopa County Elections that helps explains everything people need to know about the

 2024 Primary Election!  

Medical & Legal Experts Join It Goes Too Far Campaign in Confirming Dangers of the Proposed Abortion Amendment

Phoenix – Today, members of the medical and legal communities joined the It Goes Too Far campaign in confirming the extent of the problems with the proposed abortion amendment and the dangers it poses to girls, women, viable fetuses, parents, and taxpayers. Arizona licensed attorney, Dawn Grove, warned voters who signed the petition believing the amendment reinstates a Roe v Wade type law, that this amendment goes far beyond Roe. Grove said that it will be the courts’ interpretation of the language that will matter, and they will see the loopholes that demand abortion without limits and without most safety regulations. “The exemption for late-term abortion is so broad that it includes virtually any reason. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that late term abortions can be performed under the “mental health” exemption for financial reasons, family issues, stress or anxiety, anything related to her wellbeing. That is the precedent Arizona courts will look to under this amendment.” Grove pointed to the vague language used to address who can perform abortions, “Consider the amendment uses the term “treating healthcare professional” instead of doctor or physician. Without defining who among the many ‘healthcare professionals’ listed under Arizona law can provide abortions, it leaves one to wonder why proponents included chiropractors, podiatrists, and veterinarians. This is not taking the health and safety of girls and women seriously.” Recently retired OB-GYN from Prescott, Dr. Melinda Martin, knows the dangers of removing the doctor from the doctor-patient relationship and leaving girls and women to take chemical abortion pills without medical oversight. Dr. Martin warns, “They will be tempted to order the pills through the mail, take them without anyone knowing, and without a doctor. Those girls and women will be alone and likely unable to get the help they need if they run into a problem. This frightens me, knowing young women will be fooled into thinking a chemical abortion lacks health risks, and they will end up in a life-threatening situation.” One of the greatest risks of taking the abortion pills without doctor oversight is taking it when a woman has an ectopic pregnancy. Michelle Tussing, a Registered Nurse at Choices Pregnancy Centers said they have discovered nine ectopic pregnancies in the last eight months. If those women had taken the abortion pill, they would have been in great danger, “Abortion pills cause pain and bleeding. Ectopic pregnancies cause pain and bleeding. It’s imperative that women know basic facts about their pregnancies before taking abortion pills. This amendment would remove these safety measures from women.” Several commonsense safety precautions have already fallen in Michigan after that state passed a similar amendment less than two years ago, including informed consent, required clinic reporting of complications and deaths, and doctor oversight. And now the ACLU, citing the abortion amendment, is suing that state to force taxpayers to fund abortions. It Goes Too Far spokeswoman, Joanna De La Cruz encouraged voters to read the amendment for themselves and noted, “Ninety percent of Arizona voters support limits on abortion at 15 weeks or earlier. So, the abortion amendment campaign doesn’t want voters to know that Arizona law already allows abortion up to 15 weeks – and beyond for medical emergencies. They don’t want voters to know that miscarriage care and ectopic pregnancy care are already protected under Arizona law and are not abortion – a fact even AG Kris Mayes affirmed last week. The deceit and the misinformation being sown by the abortion amendment campaign is outrageous and offensive. They know Arizona voters wouldn’t support the amendment if they were honest about how far it goes.” Learn more at ItGoesTooFar.com

Arizona Physicians Celebrate 822,460 Signatures to Put Arizona Abortion Access Act on the Ballot

PHOENIX, Ariz. —  Today, Arizona for Abortion Access turned in 822,460 signatures to get the Arizona Abortion Access Act on the ballot in November — the most signatures ever collected in the state’s history. In response, Dr. Cadey Harrel, a family physician in Tucson and Arizona Lead for the Committee to Protect Health Care, released the following statement: “Physicians stand with the 822,460 Arizonans who want the opportunity to restore and protect our freedom to make our own health care decisions without government interference. Doctors know that decisions around pregnancy and abortion are deeply personal, and should be made by patients, their families, and their physicians — not politicians. That’s why over 550 medical professionals in Arizona have 

signed a letter

 endorsing the Arizona Abortion Access Act. Arizona physicians and voters are speaking loud and clear: It’s time to take back our bodily autonomy, our health, and our freedom.”   Dr. Harrel is available for media interviews by Zoom or phone from 2-5pm PT. To coordinate an interview please contact Jodi Helsel at 

[email protected]

.

Arizona for Abortion Access submits most voter signatures in state history

PHOENIX – Arizona for Abortion Access announced on Wednesday that they submitted a record breaking 823,685 signatures toward a Constitutional amendment enshrining the right to access abortion on the November ballot. That number represents one out of every five Arizona voters and is more than double the number of signatures required for a citizens initiative.   “This is the most signatures ever gathered for a ballot measure in Arizona history, which is a testament to the broad support among Arizona voters for restoring and protecting abortion access in Arizona,” said Cheryl Bruce, campaign manager of Arizona for Abortion Access.   When it is passed by voters in November, the Arizona Abortion Access Act will enshrine a right to abortion in the state constitution and prevent the state from passing laws that restrict access to abortion before fetal viability or after that point to protect the health and life of the pregnant patient.   Signatures were gathered by more than 7,000 volunteers across all 15 Arizona counties in support of the amendment. On trailheads, in coffee shops, book stores, and public events, signature-gatherers were overwhelmed by support in all demographic groups.   “After spending several months talking to voters across the political spectrum, from age 18 to 80, I have no doubt that Arizona voters will overwhelmingly pass the Arizona Abortion Access Act. Arizonans will finally be able to trust that our reproductive freedoms are restored and protected in our state constitution,” said Susan Ashley, a volunteer signature collector who began collecting signatures in January.   Advocates of reproductive freedom say that abortion bans, like the extreme ban currently in place in Arizona, fail to recognize the reality that “every pregnancy is different and every woman deserves the best care suited to her situation,” said Dr. Paul Isaacson, an Arizona OB/GYN of 30 years. “Anti-abortion extremists peddle lies about safety, why women seek abortion and who can perform abortion. The fact is, abortion care remains as safe under the Arizona Abortion Access Act as it is now; it’s a decision women do not take lightly, and it’s basic healthcare that patients need to access whether they are surivors of sexual assault, experiencing medical complications or for countless other valid reasons no arbitrary, extreme ban can possibly account for.”   Arizona currently has an extreme abortion ban with no exceptions for rape, incest or medical complications.   “Arizona women do not want to live in 1864 or 1964. We want to make our own decisions about pregnancy and abortion with our doctors and families, not judges or politicians,” said Chris Love, spokesperson for Arizona for Abortion Access.   At the campaign’s signature turn-in event, several Arizona women shared their personal experiences needing abortion care.   “The consequences of an illegal abortion continue to haunt my family,” Lake Havasu abortion patient Pamela Hill said. “I hope my story of the physical and emotional pain caused by abortion bans sends a message: every pregnancy is different, every patient is different, and every woman deserves access to appropriate care, not dangerous restrictions.” These experiences have made Hill determined to fight so that others don’t share the same traumas today as she did prior to Roe v. Wade. “We must vote to restore and protect the right to abortion,” she said.   In addition to the historic number of signatures, Arizona for Abortion Access has seen robust fundraising from supporters across the state and the country. The campaign has received donations from more than 13,000 unique grassroots donors with an average donation of $43. Earlier this month, they also announced the planned launch of a $15 million bilingual television and radio ad campaign targeting voters in Phoenix and Tucson.   The campaign is endorsed by more than 40 state and national organizations representing the faith community, the Latino community, labor unions, indigenous groups, reproductive rights organizations, veterans groups, voter advocacy organizations and many others.   “There’s no question that Arizonans across the political spectrum see reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy as central to their fundamental rights,” said Chris Love. “That includes the freedom to access abortion and keep politicians out of our private and personal healthcare decisions, once and for all.”   To learn more and access the Arizona for Abortion Access press kit,

visit our website

. For a video stream of today's press conference,

watch here

.

 

Construction set to begin on I-40/US 93 Kingman interchange

PHOENIX – Work is scheduled to get underway Thursday, July 11, on a free-flowing interchange connecting US 93 and Interstate 40 in Kingman. The $106 million project is planned to eliminate delays that can occur for passenger and truck traffic on the main route between Las Vegas and Arizona. While traffic now must stop at a traffic signal where Beale Street intersects with I-40, a system-to-system interchange will feature ramps that allow traffic to flow freely. Those new ramps will create one new mile of highway between I-40 and US 93, running northwest of the existing interchange at I-40 and Beale Street. Other project features include:

  • Widening more than one mile of I-40 in both directions between the new interchange and Stockton Hill Road
  • Adding a merge lane on US 93 northbound
  • Widening and/or rehabilitating four bridges on I-40
  • Building sound walls along a portion of I-40 to the west of Stockton Hill Road
  • Constructing drainage features

For more information on the Kingman interchange project and to subscribe for updates, please visit 

azdot.gov/WestKingmanTI

. Visitors to the webpage can also watch a flyover video simulation of what the project will look like upon completion. This project is among several underway or planned to improve US 93, which travels 200 miles between Wickenburg and the Nevada line at Hoover Dam. In addition to constructing the Kingman interchange, ADOT's long-term vision calls for a four-lane divided highway through the entire 200 miles between Wickenburg and Nevada. Since 1999, ADOT has completed 19 projects to modernize US 93 between Wickenburg and I-40. A current US 93 project near Wickenburg is now more than halfway done as work continues to transform a 5-mile section of two-lane roadway into a four-lane divided highway. Work on the Wickenburg-area project is expected to continue through this year, with lane restrictions limited to overnight hours to minimize traffic impacts. More information is available at 

azdot.gov/US93Wickenburg

. ADOT’s Five-Year Transportation Facilities Construction Program for 2025-2029 has these additional projects scheduled to convert segments US 93 to four-lane divided highway: mileposts 106-109.5. in the Cane Springs area; mileposts 190.5-193.5 in the Vista Royale area northwest of Wickenburg; and mileposts 161.7-166.2 in the area of Big Jim Wash. For more information on other current and planned improvement projects in northwestern Arizona, please visit the 

Northwest Regional Improvements US 93 and I-40 webpage

.

Joint Legislative Committee on Water Security Finds SB 1221 Would Have “Stopped the Bleeding” in Rural Groundwater Basins

PHOENIX, ARIZONA— Members of the Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Water Security heard emotional testimony on Friday from Arizona farmers who detailed the hard work and concessions they made to negotiate key provisions of SB 1221. If adopted, the measure would have allowed the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources to permanently close the Willcox, Hualapai, and Gila Bend groundwater basins to new groundwater pumping and required all existing pumping to be reduced by 10% over 10 years, with the opportunity for up to 15% over 20 years. "We heard testimony from stakeholders and the Department of Water Resources that verifies passing SB 1221 would have stopped the bleeding in these critical groundwater basins," said Senator Sine Kerr, co-sponsor of the bill and Chair of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Energy & Water. "Passing SB 1221 would have allowed the Director to permanently close the Willcox, Hualapai, and Gila Bend basins to all new pumping, which would prevented new and existing users from increasing the total amount of groundwater that could be withdrawn from these basins. This is what the local people have been asking for, so they can work on improving groundwater conditions in the basin." "While radical out-of-state environmental groups have played politics with Arizona’s critical groundwater supplies, Republicans have offered meaningful solutions to help address our state’s most pressing groundwater issues, including stopping new groundwater resources from being used," said Representative Gail Griffin, co-sponsor of the bill and Chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources, Energy & Water. "This includes HB 2060, which would have allowed voters to establish an emergency Irrigation Non-Expansion Area in the Willcox basin, and HB 2022, which would have allowed the voters to establish a Domestic Water Improvement District in the Willcox Basin. This year, we introduced many bills to help address groundwater issues throughout the state, including SB 1221 and others. Another bill, HB 2063, would have given each owner of a domestic well in the state a certificated groundwater right, but Governor Hobbs vetoed that bill." "SB 1221 is the most comprehensive piece of groundwater legislation offered since the 1980 Groundwater Management Act," said Representative Tim Dunn, Yuma farmer and former Chair of the House Committee on Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs. "There’s no law in Arizona allowing a basin to be completely closed or requiring existing users to reduce groundwater use. Not even Active Management Areas require these stipulations. SB 1221 represents the first time in our state’s history where rural farmers have come together and said, 'We’re willing to be regulated; we’re willing to put reductions on ourselves if you’re willing to listen to us on the maximum amount that can be done without putting us out of business.' That has never happened before." "We had an opportunity this year to permanently close three critical groundwater basins to all new groundwater pumping and to require mandatory groundwater reductions of 10% over 10 years, with the opportunity for up to 15% over 20 years," said Senator T.J. Shope, Pinal County resident and Vice-Chair of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Energy &Water. "Each year these basins aren’t closed, additional groundwater can be pumped from the basin. We must close the basins so people can begin to work on improving the aquifer without new users coming in." Video of Friday’s meeting is posted here.

New center to help lead national Indigenous language revitalization efforts

TUCSON, Ariz. — A new center at the University of Arizona is one of only four designated by the U.S. Department of Education to lead a collective effort to empower tribal communities across the country to revitalize and maintain their languages. The Department of Education began funding the new West Region Native American Language Resource Center in the fall. The new center, administratively housed in the university's American Indian Language Development Institute and physically located in the 

College of Education

, is one of four inaugural centers doing similar work at other institutions. The others are a national center at the University of Hawai'i and three regional centers at the University of Oregon and Little Priest Tribal College in Winnebago, Nebraska. The U of A center will primarily serve Indigenous communities in Arizona, California, Nevada and Utah. All four centers are already working collaboratively to promote a collective approach to service and assistance to existing language programs and those in development. A track record of tribal language revitalization The new center will be largely an extension of what the university's American Indian Language Development Institute, or AILDI, has been doing for decades. Established in 1978 and housed in the College of Education since 1990, AILDI's core programming involves bringing tribal members to campus for workshops to promote the use of tribal languages as a key aspect of revitalization efforts.

Ofelia Zepeda

, a Regents Professor of linguistics and director of AILDI, serves as co-principal investigator for the new center. 

Sheilah E. Nicholas

, a professor in the College of Education and AILDI faculty member, will serve as center director. Zepeda and Nicholas have a decades-long track record of helping tribal communities revitalize and promote the use of their languages, making AILDI the perfect home for the new center. "When we looked at the call for proposals for the grant, the things it listed were the things we were doing for years," said Zepeda, a renowned Tohono O'odham linguist who wrote the first grammar book in the Tohono O'odham language. The grant will also pay for much of the training for tribal communities. The new center will more formally establish the network of partnerships across tribal communities and other institutions that have applied the AILDI model in service to local tribal community language revitalization efforts: the University of Oregon's Northwest Indigenous Language Institute, and the Hopilavayi Summer Institute from 2004 to 2010 in the Hopi community in northeastern Arizona, Nicholas said. Partnerships with tribes that tailor Indigenous language education to each community will be the core of the center's work, Zepeda and Nicholas said, adding that each community has unique linguistic needs that are deeply linked to geographic location. The western United States is the most linguistically diverse region in the U.S., with California alone being home to more than 100 Indigenous languages, Nicholas said. "Enumeration has always been a curiosity from the outside," she said, driven by many linguists' narrow view of how language is used. "If we can shift and show the vitality, it broadens the definition of language – it's not just a form that people use to communicate on a daily basis. That's often the measure, but there's many different kinds of forms, such as prayers and songs, that still use the language." Much of the center's programming will involve an instructional technique known as Indigenous language immersion, which Nicholas has taught to tribal educators since the 1990s. Indigenous language immersion involves developing teaching methods that use the language as the medium of instruction 50 to 100% of the time. These techniques, influenced by French immersion in Canada, were first applied by the Mohawk Indigenous community in North America, and later became an Indigenous language immersion school movement for the Hawai'ian language and Māori, the language of the Indigenous Polynesian people of New Zealand. The new center has the potential to support this growing movement, Zepeda and Nicholas said. AILDI has helped implement Indigenous language immersion instruction in communities across the U.S., and the new center will allow the institute to expand support of community language revitalization efforts into the education systems serving Indigenous communities, Zepeda and Nicholas said. One

 

challenge for Indigenous language teachers, who are often so busy working in the classroom, is finding enough time and resources to evaluate their curriculums and show how effective they are. "One question we always get from educators is, 'I see why we should do this, but where is the buy-in among decision-makers?'" Nicholas said. Emerging research, she added, confirms that Indigenous language immersion education is not subtractive but additive – students are not only academically excelling but also learning their community's ancestral language and developing a strong cultural identity and a desire to give back. A network of experts for tribal linguists Growing up on the Tohono O'odham Nation, Ronald Geronimo learned O'odham as his first language and uses it every day. Many O'odham children today do not speak the language fluently and only know a few vocabulary words, Geronimo said. "Now, children look at the language as something only adults know or use," Geronimo said. "Some of them think that you don't learn the language until you get older because they only see older people speaking it." As co-director of Tohono O'odham Community College's O'odham Ñi'okǐ Ki:, or O'odham Language Center, Geronimo helps lead a mission to "reclaim" the O'odham language – returning its usage to everyday life. To do that, Geronimo and his colleagues at the center have developed programs to teach O'odham to children in schools and immerse students in the language. Geronimo has partnered for years with AILDI to develop the center's programs. They include partnering O'odham language experts with elementary educators to help them teach courses in the language, as well as teaching parents who may also not be fluent how to use the language more often around their children at home. "We're trying to have a comprehensive approach, not just to doing immersion in the school but also with the parents and in the communities with the overall goal of having the child grow up seeing the language," he said. The federal grant that established the new center, Geronimo said, will provide a valuable network where he and other tribal linguists can connect and share resources toward a shared goal to support Indigenous language revitalization. "We'll have a lot more resources to do what we want to do, and maybe we don't have the funding to do it, but maybe they can assist in that way," Geronimo said. "It's a good thing to have that expertise available." Ultimately, Zepeda said, how the center works will be largely up to the tribal communities that come to use its resources. "We'll have our own ideas to meet the obligations of the grant," Zepeda said. "But we'll also be listening to the communities about what they want and what they need."

Your search query contained invalid characters or was empty. Please try again with a valid query.